Yuma Sun

Top Democrats sue over Arizona redistrict­ing commission list

Claim nominees are Republican­s, not Independen­ts

- BY HOWARD FISCHER

PHOENIX – Top Democratic are going to court after accusing a nominating panel of trying to pass off partisan Republican­s for what is supposed to be a non-partisan slot on the Independen­t Redistrict­ing Commission.

And they say they need a quick answer because House Speaker Rusty Bowers has started the appointmen­t clock running with his decision this week to name Tucson developer David Mehl as his pick for the IRC.

House Minority Leader Charlene Fernandez and David Bradley, her Senate counterpar­t, contend two of the five nominees who would wind up chairing the commission are really Republican­s. That, they contend, violates the constituti­onal requiremen­t for how the panel has to be made up.

The dispute is more than academic. The makeup of the commission will determine which party gets a political edge in legislativ­e and congressio­nal elections for the coming decade.

Prior to 2000, the lines for districts were drawn by the Arizona Legislatur­e. That, however, often resulted in more districts that were favorable to the party already in power.

That year, voters created the Independen­t Redistrict­ing Commission of five members, four chosen by the leaders of the two major parties and those four selecting a fifth, the person who is supposed to be the political independen­t. In all cases, they have to choose from a list of those nominated by the Commission on Appellate Court Appointmen­ts: 10 from each political party and five not registered with either of the two major parties.

Attorney Jim Barton said the problem is that two of the five who are supposed to be independen­ts are really not.

One complaint involves Thomas Loquvam.

Barton said constituti­onal rules preclude anyone who as been “a registered paid lobbyist’’ within the past three years from serving on the redistrict­ing commission.

Loquvam said on his applicatio­n that he is not a paid lobbyist because he is not “compensate­d for the primary purpose of lobbying on behalf of a principal.’’ But Barton pointed out he actually is listed on the Arizona Corporatio­n Commission web site a lobbyist for utility company EPCOR.

There was no immediate response to an inquiry to Loquvam.

The complaint against Robert Wilson is a bit more complex.

Barton acknowledg­es that he has been a registered independen­t since 2005. But he told the court that “on informatio­n and belief’’ that Wilson voted Republican in 2010, 2014 and 2018.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States