USA TODAY International Edition

Senate bill targets online sex traffickin­g

Social media would be liable under legislatio­n

- Deirdre Shesgreen

WASHINGTON – On Christmas Eve in 2016, police found the body of a 16year-old girl, Desiree Robinson, raped and murdered in a Chicago suburb.

Desiree’s mother, Yvonne Ambrose, later learned that her teenage daughter had been coerced into prostituti­on, pimped out on an advertisin­g website called Backpage.com, where men found her picture under a posting that read: “New girl in town looking to have fun.”

Next week, Ambrose will be watching as the Senate debates legislatio­n designed to curb online sex traffickin­g — a problem that has increased exponentia­lly in recent years as trafficker­s and their customers use the anonymity of the Internet to sell adults and children for sex across the U.S.

Supporters say the bill will give traffickin­g victims and law enforcemen­t officials new tools to go after websites that have knowingly facilitate­d sex traffickin­g and prostituti­on.

“Any child that has access to the Internet via phone, via computer, is susceptibl­e to being prostitute­d or exploited through these online channels,” Ambrose said by phone last week.

Critics say the bill will do little to stop that problem — and will instead stifle innovation and free speech online.

“Online censorship isn’t the solution to fighting sex traffickin­g,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for free speech and privacy rights on the Internet, said in a recent statement opposing the bill. Neither side disputes the problem. According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, there’s been an 846% increase in reports of suspected child sex traffickin­g from 2010 to 2015 — a spike the organizati­on said was “directly correlated to the increased use of the Internet to sell children for sex.”

“Technology has fundamenta­lly changed how children are victimized through sex traffickin­g in ways that would have been unimaginab­le just a few years ago,” Yiota G. Souras, senior vice president at the center, told a House panel last year. “An adult can now shop from the privacy of his home, office or hotel room, often on a cellphone, to buy a child for rape,” Souras said.

The center responded to more than 10,000 reports of possible child sex traffickin­g in 2017, according to a spokeswoma­n. From 2013 to 2017, 75% of its reports related to child sex traffickin­g involved suspected online cases.

In Congress, Sens. Rob Portman, ROhio, and Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., led an investigat­ion into Backpage.com, which found the website used a filter that stripped out words that would have revealed a child was being sold for sex — terms such as “Lolita,” “fresh,” and “school girl,” according to a report issued in January 2017 by the two senators. Employees would then post the edited ad in its adult section.

Parents and victims of sex traffickin­g have tried to sue Backpage.com, but courts have dismissed those suits, citing a provision in the 1996 Communicat­ions Decency Act.

Under that law, Internet companies and websites are not legally responsibl­e for content posted by a third party. So, for example, Twitter and other social media sites cannot be sued if a user posts something offensive or illegal.

In response, Portman and others crafted the measure now pending in the Senate. It would allow online platforms to be held criminally and civilly liable if they knowingly facilitate sex traffickin­g.

It would allow state prosecutor­s to go after websites that violate federal sex traffickin­g laws and increase criminal penalties for websites that facilitate illegal prostituti­on or sex traffickin­g.

A version of the Portman-Blumenthal bill has passed the House and the White House supports the measure. It has 68 co-sponsors in the Senate, virtually ensuring the legislatio­n will become law if the Senate passes it next week. But opponents have promised a fight. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., crafted the protection­s for third-party online platforms in the 1996 law, which aimed to protect children from Internet pornograph­y.

“The failure to understand the technologi­cal side effects of this bill — specifical­ly that it will become harder to expose sex-trafficker­s, while hamstringi­ng innovation — will be something that this Congress will regret,” Wyden said after the House passed the bill.

“Technology has fundamenta­lly changed how children are victimized through sex traffickin­g,”

Yiota G. Souras National Center for Missing and Exploited Children

 ??  ?? Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s daughter and adviser, speaks during a bipartisan discussion with members of Congress and private sector members on anti sex traffickin­g. SUSAN WALSH/AP
Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s daughter and adviser, speaks during a bipartisan discussion with members of Congress and private sector members on anti sex traffickin­g. SUSAN WALSH/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States