The Times Herald (Norristown, PA)

Splitting hairs with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

- Christine Flowers Columnist

I’m certain that three lines into this column, there are certain readers who will shake their beautiful blown-out tresses and say “doesn’t she have anything more important to write about?” I respect that, because before I decided to tackle this topic, I also had a moment’s hesitation. Is the fact that Nancy Pelosi decided to get her hair done really an issue of national importance?

And of course, I concluded that it is.

It’s not so much the “doing” of the hair, which is a fairly mundane activity for most women with unruly mops. That goes doubly for women in the public eye. I remember whenever I would appear on television, my mother would call me up and before even commenting on my scathingly brilliant logic or spot-on observatio­ns, she’d say something about my hair. Usually negative. Actually, always negative.

So Nancy Pelosi had every right to get her hair done last week, even though she was violating the regulation­s she herself championed to restrict the spread of the coronaviru­s.

As the first and only female Speaker of the House of Representa­tives (so far,) Annunziata D’Alessandro Pelosi is one of the most visible women in the world, and she has to look her best while adoring and hostile eyes turn their gaze upon her.

I don’t even have much of a problem with the fact that she didn’t wear a mask during the entire Wahs-Trim-Blow Dry. While I kept my mask on my face during every stage of my most recent salon visit, I would have preferred to take it off. A breathing human with bad hair is often preferable to a perfectly-coiffed-corpse.

But Nancy pushed for the regulation­s that we all wear masks, everywhere, including while we shower.

And Nancy is a big fan of wearing masks that virtue signal her virtue, singularly, when addressing the journalist­s. And Nancy supports Gavin Newsome’s draconian decision to shut down or severely restrict salon services during the pandemic Without an end.

So a little thing like hyprocrisy, as in “Rules for Thee but Not for Me” wrankles.

Far from seeking forgivenes­s, or even acknowledg­ing that she had done anything wrong, the Speaker of the House offered this gem: “I take responsibi­lity for trusting the word of the neighborho­od salon that I’ve been to…many times. It was as set up, and I take responsibi­lity for falling for a set up.”

Digest that for a moment. Nancy, who violated her own deeply-held principles on pandemic shutdowns, on wearing masks, on being “all in this together,” blamed the person whose livelihood is being destroyed by those principles. And she wants an apology.

I am not a criminal defense attorney, and my friend Jeffrey pointed out that if you lure someone into doing something they might otherwise not do, there might be a good case of “You made me love you, I didn’t wanna do it, I didn’t wanna do it” and so forth.

But here, Nancy was the one who made the appointmen­t, went to the salon, sashayed from shampoo chair to trim chair to blow out chair with grace, and did it with the full knowledge that it was in violation of the very regulation­s she trumpeted. So it’s really hard to swallow the “set up” excuse her supporters are trying to shove down our throats (through our masks).

Nancy Pelosi is deflecting the blame from herself to a private citizen. In bringing the full weight of her authority, popularity and presence to bear against the salon owner, the Speaker of the House of Representa­tives has triggered an avalanche of bad publicity, slurs, and death threats directed at the poor woman.

But she is the one who deserves an apology.

If this is not an example of the pathetic, tone deaf nature of the virtue-signaling preachers of the progressiv­e gospel, I honestly don’t know what is.

But in the next two months, I’m sure I’ll find out.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States