ICE detention of pregnant women is ‘cruel and anti-life’
At this year’s March for Life, President Donald Trump told participants, “you love every child, born and unborn, because you believe that every life is sacred, that every child is a precious gift from God.”
At the same time, President Trump praised the pro-life movement for its work “to build a society where life is celebrated, protected and cherished.”
In recent changes to policies, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has defied both the letter and spirit of the president’s words.
ICE has ended a long honored and sensible practice of the presumptive release of pregnant women in detention and has chosen to detain them indefinitely. Absent extraordinary circumstances, pregnant women should not be forced to face the stress, trauma and inadequate care in detention facilities while awaiting what are civil and not criminal proceedings. To imperil the lives of unborn babies to “punish” their mothers is bad policy; and, it is cruel and anti-life.
The failure to receive proper nutrition during pregnancy or treatment for health conditions that contribute to poor pregnancy outcomes exacts great human costs. But, such detention is also costly to taxpayers, especially since many are held in private “for profit” prisons contracted to detain immigrants.
How can ICE or the Trump administration rely on these corporations, whose business is to make a profit, to provide adequate prenatal care?
As President Trump has said, “every life is sacred.” This policy change by ICE suggests that some lives are less sacred than others. Subjecting pregnant women and their unborn children to the ordeal of being jailed contradicts President Trump’s pro-life and pro-family stances. The president should instruct ICE to reverse course.
THOMAS WENSKI, MIAMI Editor’s note: Wenski is archbishop of the Archdiocese of Miami.
ICE has ended a long honored and sensible practice of the presumptive release of pregnant women in detention and has chosen to detain them indefinitely.