The Palm Beach Post

Recent days prove Trump is not fit to be president

- By Joe Scarboroug­h Joe Scarboroug­h is host of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” He wrote this for the Washington Post.

The past few days have matched some of the Trump era’s most frantic and maniacal weeks. Washington headlines have been driven by Michael Wolff ’s Swampland confession­al, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” and the slew of revelation­s that emerged in its turbulent wake.

On one side of the political divide, Trump antagonist­s clutched Wolff ’s book to their breasts while whispering sweet nothings to the 25th Amendment. On the other, Trump apologists furiously took on the role of grammar police, highlighti­ng every misplaced comma or mislabeled character in hopes that those errors would obfuscate the book’s central truth: that Donald J. Trump is not fit to be pres- ident.

Even journalist­s who resent Wolff and his methods (there will surely be more of them after the book’s phenomenal success) begrudging­ly admit that the best-seller paints an accurate portrait of the president’s dystopian world.

But the most curious reaction to “Fire and Fury” has come from influentia­l conservati­ves who have long carried the “Never Trump” banner. These thought leaders can’t seem to decide whom they loathe more — Trump or Wolff. The most prominent example this week was the New York Times’ David Brooks, who dismissed the book as “anti-Trump lowbrow- ism” and warned that the “Never Trump” movement risks becoming what it hates by succumbing to Wolff ’s low standards.

The columnist approvingl­y cited reports that behind the scenes Trump is a well-informed and affable leader who knows how to run a good meeting. Brooks even makes the claim that “the White House is getting more profession­al.”

I find myself at a rare loss for words. Let’s simply review Trump’s actions over the three days before Brooks’ column was published Jan. 8.

The president once again advocated making it easier for politician­s like him to sue columnists such as Brooks. Such a move would do immeasurab­le harm to our First Amendment free-speech guarantees.

Trump also pressured Republican­s to interfere with the special counsel’s investigat­ion and politicize the rule of law. This autocratic partisan plea to subvert Robert Mueller’s work comes after the former FBI director has already secured conviction­s of Trump’s national security adviser and a top foreign policy expert, along with indictment­s of his former campaign manager and another key campaign operative.

Our commander in chief also attacked the integrity of the U.S. judicial system because he didn’t like the outcome of an inconseque­ntial lower-court ruling. And, hard as it may be to believe, the president had time last week to again attack the men and women of the FBI and suggested that they tried to use their legal authority to rig the 2016 election.

Trump used a news conference last Wednesday to attack his 2016 Democratic opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, while revealing again his autocratic impulses by demanding the jailing of his political rivals. Trump put on this crude display while the leader of Norway watched in horror.

And while at a bipartisan meeting of lawmakers on Thursday, Trump reportedly offended U.S. allies across Central America, the Caribbean and Africa by denigratin­g them as “shithole countries.”

This is a “more profession­al White House”? Only if you have been so desensitiz­ed by Trump’s first year in office that you no longer recognize when your country is in danger.

Yes, columnists and Capitol Hill politician­s would do themselves and their country a favor by fighting to find common ground on the issues that divide us as a nation. But when faced with a once-in-a-lifetime challenge to America’s constituti­onal values, there can be no room for compromise. When a democratic­ally elected leader exposes himself as a man with autocratic instincts, splitting the difference only starts this country down the path to a constituti­onal crisis.

There can be no compromise or middle ground between those who defend the Constituti­on and a president who 4understan­ds so little of what has made our nation great. The fight for America’s future has begun, and the time for rationaliz­ing Trump’s aberrant behavior is long past.

 ??  ?? Scarboroug­h
Scarboroug­h

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States