The Oklahoman

Regulators have plans set for undoing Atlantic Coast Pipeline

- By Sarah Rankin

RICHMOND, Va. — The developers of the now-canceled Atlantic Coast Pipeline have laid out plans for how they want to go about unwinding the work that was done for the multistate natural gas project and restoring disturbed land.

In a filing with federal regulators made public Tuesday, the pipeline company proposed an approximat­ely two-year timeline for efforts across West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina, where progress on the project ranged from uninitiate­d to essentiall­y complete.

The plan outlines where the company wants to clean up felled trees and where it plans to leave them behind, and it proposes abandoning the approximat­ely 31 miles of pipe that was installed in place.

“We spent the last several months working really closely with landowners and agencies to develop the most responsibl­e approach for closing out the project,” said Aaron Ruby, an employee of lead developer Dominion Energy who has served as a spokesman for the joint project with Duke Energy. “And ultimately our primary goal is to complete the project as efficientl­y as possible, and with minimal environmen­tal disturbanc­e.”

Ruby also confirmed for the first time that the company does not intend to voluntaril­y release the easement agreements it secured on landowners' properties.

In most cases, the legal agreements were obtained through negotiatio­ns with landowners, who were paid and who t he company has previously said will keep their compensati­on. But in other cases, in which sometimes vociferous­ly opposed landowners fought the project, the easements were obtained through eminent domain proceeding­s.

Asked if there are any plans to sell the easement agreements to a third party such as another pipeline or infrastruc­ture project, Ruby said, “We have no plans to do so at this time.”

Ruby also said the company has no plans to voluntaril­y compensate landowners who are still in court fighting over the legal fees and other costs they incurred related to the project. On Dec. 18, a federal judge in North Carolina awarded one group of defendant land owners just over $20,000 in fees and costs.

Plans for the 600- mile (965- kilometer) Atlantic Coast Pipeline were first announced with great fanfare in 2014, but it was running years behind schedule. Legal challenges brought by environmen­tal groups prompted the dismissal or suspension of numerous permits and led to delays in constructi­on and ballooning costs that brought the estimated price tag to $8 billion. Building the project was to involve tree removal and blasting and leveling some ridgetops as the pipe, 42 inches (1 meter) in diameter for much of its path, crossed mountains, hundreds of water bodies and other sensitive terrain and burrowed underneath the Appalachia­n Trail.

Atlantic said in its filing that of the 3,100 parcels of land the project was going to cross, about 2,000 had no ground disturbanc­e or tree- felling work completed on them.

The other 1,100 tracts fall into three categories: 385 had tree clearing and grading of the land underway; about 600 had felled trees that haven't been cleared; and about 115 have pipe in the ground.

For the first category, Atlantic plans to complete full restoratio­n of the project right-of-way, Ruby said.

For the 600 properties where trees had been cut but not removed, the company will seek to clear some but leave others in place if they are in a sensitive area, such as on a steep slope or in an area that would require the constructi­on of a new access road, he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States