The Oklahoman

Q&A WITH SARAH B. EDWARDS

- PAULA BURKES, BUSINESS WRITER

Indemnity clauses crucial in health care billing, claims services contracts

Q: Individual­s and entities are turning to third-party contractor­s to perform health care billing and claims services, but the cost of claims made by individual­s whose protected health informatio­n was improperly accessed or disclosed can be an issue if a business associate agreement doesn’t include an indemnific­ation clause. What’s the background of the issue?

A: Due to opportunit­ies for cost-savings through outsourcin­g, entities and individual­s covered under the

Health Insurance Portabilit­y and Accountabi­lity Act

(HIPAA), as amended by the

Health Informatio­n Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, are increasing­ly turning to contractor­s and vendors to perform certain billing, claims and even customer follow-up services on their behalf. These health plans, clearingho­uses and health care providers contract with such vendors to access the protected health informatio­n necessary to perform these services through a business associate agreement. Although HIPAA and the HITECH Act address the safeguardi­ng of protected health informatio­n by business associates, these acts don’t address who covers the cost of claims made by individual­s whose informatio­n was improperly accessed or disclosed due to a breach caused by the business associate.

Q: How can indemnific­ation clauses help?

A: A valid indemnific­ation provision essentiall­y secures coverage or reimbursem­ent in the event a client or customer sues a covered entity for harm caused by a business associate. Indemnific­ation originally was explained to me many years ago as this: if you make a mess and someone else is harmed, it’s your responsibi­lity to clean it up, not mine. Carefully drafted indemnific­ation clauses are a necessary component of any business associate agreement to clarify who pays and the extent of such payment/remediatio­n for claims.

Q: How does it work in this case?

A: In addressing an indemnific­ation provision in a business associate agreement, the parties should consider how the protected health informatio­n will be accessed and whether the business associate will store any protected health informatio­n on its systems. Storing protected health informatio­n adds an additional level of risk, versus simply accessing protected health informatio­n on a covered entity’s system. The clause should provide for the indemnific­ation and defense of a covered entity.

If there’s a breach or unauthoriz­ed access of protected health informatio­n caused by a business associate, claims will be made against a covered entity by the individual­s whose informatio­n was improperly accessed or disclosed. While a covered entity may have a direct claim against the business associate for breach of contract, without a properly drafted indemnific­ation clause, which contractua­lly obligates a business associate to pay, there’s no assurance for recovery of costs and attorney fees incurred in defending a suit or handling such claims.

Although indemnific­ation isn’t required by HIPAA, it should be addressed in any business associate agreement to ensure the parties are clear on risk allocation. In addition to including an indemnific­ation provision, requiring and maintainin­g insurance coverage to cover the costs of a protected health informatio­n breach or unauthoriz­ed access, investigat­ion and remediatio­n, as well as a robust audit provision to ensure compliance, will help to further minimize the risk of an engagement.

 ??  ?? Sarah B. Edwards is a Crowe & Dunlevy attorney and member of the firm’s health care practice group.
Sarah B. Edwards is a Crowe & Dunlevy attorney and member of the firm’s health care practice group.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States