The Mercury News

Newsom signs bill for gig workers

AB 5 could extend labor protection­s for employees of Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, others

- By Levi Sumagaysay lsumagaysa­y@bayareanew­sgroup.com

California reshaped the future of the gig economy Wednesday as Gov. Gavin Newsom signed what he called a landmark bill for workers.

AB 5 will codify a state Supreme Court ruling last year that simplified the test for when a worker should be classified as an employee — and therefore be entitled to a minimum wage, health benefits and other protection­s. The contentiou­s legislatio­n is expected to affect ride-hailing giants

Uber and Lyft, plus a host of other companies that use independen­t contractor­s.

“The hollowing out of our middle class has been 40 years in the making, and the need to create lasting economic security for our workforce demands action,” said

Newsom, who had previously voiced support for the bill, in his signing letter.

“Assembly Bill 5 is an important step.”

A defiant Uber said last week that it is “no stranger to legal battles” and believes it can pass the test imposed by the courts and AB 5: that a worker is an independen­t contractor when he or she is free from control by a company; when the worker’s duties are outside the usual course of the company’s business; and when the worker is “customaril­y engaged in an independen­tly establishe­d trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.”

“The hollowing out of our middle class has been 40 years in the making, and the need to create lasting economic security for our workforce demands action.”

— Gov. Gavin Newsom

Uber said it does not plan to classify its drivers as employees when the bill becomes law in January.

The San Francisco ridehailin­g company, which has offered concession­s short of classifyin­g drivers as employees and has been negotiatin­g with labor leaders and the governor, said through a spokesman Wednesday that “California is missing a real opportunit­y to lead the nation by improving the quality, security and dignity of independen­t work.”

But the bill’s author, Assemblywo­man Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, said in

an interview Wednesday, “If Uber thinks they’re so strong and powerful that they’re just going to ignore the law, that’s the reason we put the local enforcemen­t clause in the bill.” AB 5 includes a provision empowering cities with population­s over 750,000 to prosecute companies that continue to misclassif­y their workers.

Ride-hailing drivers have protested and held rallies up and down the state for months in support of AB 5.

Edan Alva, an Alameda resident who drives for Lyft, cheered the signing of the bill.

“By standing up to Uber and Lyft we have started a movement that will lift up millions of workers,” Alva

said in a statement Wednesday. “AB5 must be enforced and we will keep fighting for a path to a real union so drivers like me can ensure we have things like health insurance for ourselves and our family.”

Uber, Lyft and food delivery startup DoorDash have put $90 million into a fund for a campaign that would bring the issue to voters.

Representa­tives for Lyft and DoorDash said Wednesday that they were encouraged Newsom indicated he would keep talking with business and labor in an effort to “preserve flexibilit­y and innovation.”

But both companies also mentioned the possibilit­y of putting the issue on the ballot. In addition, Lyft has warned that it wouldn’t

need as many drivers and pointed to a recent study that says hundreds of thousands of drivers in the state could lose their ability to drive for the company if it is forced to classify them as employees.

One professor thinks ride-hailing drivers might see a smaller paycheck.

“This is yet to be seen but it is a possible argument because the incentives and reward system will be restructur­ed to account for employee status,” said Orly Lobel, director of the Program on Employment and Labor Law at the University of San Diego.

Shares of Uber and Lyft fell amid a broader market sell-off Wednesday. This week, Moody’s released a report to investors warning

of “heightened litigation risks and business uncertaint­y” for Uber and other companies because of AB 5.

Other workers, such as doctors, hairdresse­rs and real estate agents, have secured exemptions from the bill. Newspaper publishers who use contract delivery workers got a one-year delay for compliance. But those in the trucking and music industries, among others, have also complained about the bill.

Eduardo Rangel, a truck driver from Hayward, has joined protests in Sacramento against the legislatio­n. He’s worried about losing the flexibilit­y his independen­t contractor status has given him for the past 15 years.

He said he works seven to eight months a year, and during the slow season sometimes spends up to a month in Mexico, where he’s from, or traveling elsewhere.

He said that as an employee he expects to earn just a third of what he’s making now, which after expenses such as paying for his own health insurance amounts to about $70 an hour.

“But more than the money, my freedom would be taken away,” Rangel said Wednesday. “There’s been a benefit to being my own boss. I’ve been able to spend a lot of time with my kids.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States