The Columbus Dispatch

Senate wants strangulat­ion in domestic cases a felony

- By Jim Siegel jsiegel@dispatch.com @phrontpage

Arguing that the serious nature of strangling requires stronger penalties, the Ohio Senate on Wednesday voted to make it a felony when domestic violence involves forceful choking.

Prosecutor­s have said Ohio is one of only three states where strangling is not a felony, and the Ohio Senate unanimousl­y approved a bill to change that.

Domestic violence incidents can be charged as felonies, but prosecutor­s argue it’s not a simple move because choking incidents often do not involve major external injuries, and both juries and medical experts can struggle to understand the internal trauma that strangling causes.

Not only is it abusive, but “strangulat­ion lets the victim know that the perpetrato­r can end their life when they choose,” said Nancy Neylon, executive director of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network. She said it’s a power and control tactic “as the victim not only believes they are being killed but they feel deeply and justifiabl­y terrified during the incident and for a long time afterward.”

Delaware County Prosecutor Carol O’Brien told lawmakers about an incident involving a drunken man who came home and slapped, kicked and choked his 36-week pregnant wife into unconsciou­sness after she rejected his demand for sex.

Under existing law, O’Brien said, that type of assault typically is charged as misdemeano­r domestic violence with a maximum six months in jail.

To be labeled felonious assault would require the state to show that serious physical harm had occurred, which can require the state to hire an expert to review the case, O’Brien said. The bill would no longer require the hiring of experts to say that strangulat­ion constitute­s serious physical harm.

“Given that there is no genuine dispute as to the dangers of strangulat­ion, the proposed legislatio­n would be a welcome boon to prosecutor­s across the state,” O’Brien said.

Ohio Public Defender Tim Young’s office opposes Senate Bill 207, arguing the bill could lead to thousands more people charged with felonies, including incidents that result in little harm, and “will not deter future cases.”

“Current law is sufficient for handling these types of cases,” the office said. “If all the elements are not present, then the case should not be a felonious assault. ... In the cases where serious physical harm has occurred, prosecutor­s are free to charge strangulat­ion cases accordingl­y.”

Under the bill, first-offense domestic violence involving strangling would be a thirddegre­e felony. Sponsored by Sen. Stephanie Kunze, R-Hilliard, the bill now goes to the House.

In other business, House Speaker Ryan Smith pulled a bill off Wednesday’s calendar that would set up a statewide system for tracking rape kits. The move came after Democrats prepared to offer amendments that would eliminate Ohio’s 20-year statute of limitation­s in cases of rape and sexual assault.

“I’m really disappoint­ed because I feel like the Democrats put their amendments and politics ahead of the policy,” said Smith, R-Bidwell. He said he’s willing to discuss the statute of limitation­s, but it “is a very complex area that certainly doesn’t need to be brought up, from a process standpoint, on the House floor.”

House Democrats argue that a number of states have eliminated the statute of limitation­s on rape, and victims shouldn’t be pushed by an arbitrary timeline.

The House also introduced and immediatel­y started hearings Wednesday on a resolution that seeks to steer people toward ballot issues that create new laws (initiated statutes) rather than constituti­onal amendments.

The proposal would simplify the process for collecting signatures for an initiated statute and prohibit lawmakers from changing the law for one year if the statute is approved. It also would raise the voting threshold to 60 percent for any future constituti­onal amendment to pass on the ballot.

“I’d like to see it passed, but there’s a lot of discussion to be had with it,” Smith said. “It’s really about protecting the Constituti­on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States