The Columbus Dispatch

Trump proposes ways to squelch protest in capital

- By Jennifer A. Dlouhy

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump’s presidency has inspired huge protests, with hundreds of thousands of women marching on the National Mall and scientists swarming the White House fence.

But now the Trump administra­tion is seeking to restrict protests by effectivel­y blocking them from the north sidewalk of the White House and making it easier for police to shut them down. A National Park Service proposal also would allow for charging organizers for the cost of putting up barricades or reseeding grass.

The proposed regulation could curtail demonstrat­ions on some of Washington’s most popular staging grounds, including the National Mall where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I have a dream”’ speech in 1963. It also includes Lafayette Square across from the White House and the Pennsylvan­ia Avenue sidewalks in front of the Trump Internatio­nal Hotel.

The proposal dovetails with Republican­s’ increasing­ly heated campaign rhetoric over “mob rule” and the boisterous protests against the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Trump has also been antagonist­ic toward protesters, once waxing nostalgic about how it used to be socially acceptable to assault them.

The proposal, issued in August and open for comment through Monday, says demonstrat­ions can impose substantia­l costs on the federal government. Some of the changes are designed to “preserve an atmosphere of contemplat­ion” around the memorials, the Park Service said. Other revisions, according to the proposal, would help protect National Mall grass from being trampled and give the Park Service more time to negotiate logistics before permits would be issued for demonstrat­ions.

Fee requiremen­ts could make mass protests “too expensive to happen,” said Arthur Spitzer, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union in the District of Columbia.

“Managing public lands for the benefit of the American people” — whether demonstrat­ors or tourists — “is what Congress funds the National Park Service to do,” Spitzer said in a blog post. “While the Park Service may be strapped for funds, it cannot balance its budget on the backs of people seeking to exercise their constituti­onal rights.”

Current National Park Service rules for rallies and marches have been forged through decades of court cases, including lawsuits that limited government controls. The proposal would rewrite many of those rules — and, if enacted, face certain litigation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States