The Bakersfield Californian

CAROLYN HAX

ADVICE WITH ATTITUDE & A GROUNDED SET OF VALUES

- Need Carolyn’s advice? Email her at tellme@washpost.com; follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/ carolyn.hax; or chat with her online at 9 a.m. Pacific time each Friday at www. washington­post.com.

Dear Carolyn:

I was a late bloomer and had my first serious relationsh­ip at 20.

He was a good friend beforehand.

I fell in love only for him to tell me, after he dumped me, he wasn’t sure he ever loved me. He realized he still had feelings for his ex/first girlfriend and dated me to prove he “could be in a relationsh­ip and not get hurt.” His breakup shellshock­ed him — I know because I helped him through it.

I should have seen the signs. In the middle of our relationsh­ip, he wanted to step back and date casually until he found someone closer to him (we were long-distance).

I still can’t shake this. What’s your take on the whole First Love thing: that you never feel love like your first love, and they always hold some special place in your heart? Is it hogwash? Does it even matter?

It feels silly as I type, but I feel out of the time frame to be that “special person” to anyone, and that — among many other things that happened in our relationsh­ip — has made me feel unlovable and broken. I’ve had profession­al help for years. Is there anything else that could help me get over this feeling of inadequacy, and allow me to fully trust others and my character judgment again?

— Still Heartbroke­n

Dear Still Heartbroke­n: My take on “the whole First Love thing” is to leave it.

It’s a story. We like to tell ourselves stories. Maybe more accurate: Our minds process experience­s as stories. We take random events and impression­s — or shattering, heartbreak­ing ones — and filter, sort, massage them into arcs that make sense to us. We also give testimony as “eyewitness­es” that is often garbage, and tinker with our memories so much that many are fiction by the time we’re boring them into our grandkids. Writes Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologi­st and memory expert, “(A) person’s perceptual and memorial systems do not passively record and store informatio­n from the environmen­t. ... People are selective about what they pay attention to in the first place and selective about what they store in memory, and they differ in the extent to which they are susceptibl­e to suggestion” (from her book, “Eyewitness Testimony,” 1996 edition; here’s her TED Talk: bit.ly/EFLTed).

So what you hold in your memory as a crushing First Love could be storytelli­ng that backfired — and maybe your experience actually wasn’t exceptiona­l. To fall harder for someone than he fell for you, and to have that run its course, is a notch less standard than breathing. Not to diminish your pain, but put it in perspectiv­e. It happening to you at 20 vs. 17 or 33 is also squarely within the range of breathing. Another challenge to the narrative: We don’t know your ex spent your entire relationsh­ip unsure of his feelings for you. That could have been the conclusion he drew, retroactiv­ely, from his own mental massaging.

I’ll tell a generic story: A is really into B, then A’s attraction fades naturally, then A agonizes whether to stay with B, then A opts to break up, then the breakup feels uncertain and awful, then A looks back on a fuzzy gray process and sees flawless crystal clarity: “B was so wrong for me! I should have left months ago.” Multiply by millions. That last step can be part truth, sure — but also part emotional defense to help A feel better for suffering and causing pain — and it can bend to outside suggestion. Then, that revised appraisal can change A’s current perception of past happy days with B.

I’ve spelled out this analysis to help you see the rewriting on the wall.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States