The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Give more attention to market milestone

- Paul Krugman He writes for The New York Times

Last week, for the first time in history, the Dow Jones industrial average closed above 40,000.

Unlike many right-wing commentato­rs, I don’t consider the stock market the best indicator of the economy’s health, or even a good indicator. But it is

an indicator. And given the state of American politics, with hyperparti­sanship and conspiracy theorizing running rampant, I’d argue that this market milestone deserves more attention than it has been getting.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but do you have any doubt that Republican­s, across the board, would be trumpeting the Dow’s record high from every rooftop if Donald Trump were still in the White House?

The background here is the gap between what we know about the actual state of our economy and the way Trump and his allies describe it.

By the numbers, the economy looks very good. Unemployme­nt has been below 4% for 27 months, a record last achieved in the late 1960s, ending in February 1970. Inflation is down from its peak in 2022, although by most measures it’s still somewhat above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%. U.S. economic growth over the past four years has been much faster than in comparable wealthy nations.

Yet Trump says that the economy is “collapsing into a cesspool of ruin.” How can such claims be reconciled with the good economic data? Well, the numbers I just cited come from official agencies — the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Another answer is to look at independen­t, private business data, like surveys of purchasing managers, which tell the same story about declining inflation as the official statistics.

But if all that seems too academic, there’s the raw fact of record stock prices. As I said, the stock market isn’t a very good indicator of how well the economy is doing. Nonetheles­s, it’s hard to reconcile Dow 40,000 with Trump’s claim that the economy is a cesspool.

In particular, even though trying to explain stock fluctuatio­ns is, in general, a waste of time, the recent run-up in stocks probably reflects economic reports suggesting the uptick in measured inflation was just a bump on the way to a soft landing.

Record highs for both the Dow and broader measures like the S&P 500 are also noteworthy given that back in 2020, during Biden and Trump’s second debate, Trump — who really does like to measure economic success by the stock market — said “the stock market will crash” if Biden won.

Trump, however, has once again claimed that stocks will crash if he doesn’t win. He has also done something that I think has no precedent: trying to take credit for a rising stock market even though he’s out of office, claiming stock market gains mean investors are betting on his future victory. That claim is, for lack of a better word, pathetic.

But let’s pretend, just for a moment, to take Trump’s story about stock prices seriously. If we do, recent developmen­ts in the 2024 horse race provide a kind of test. There’s still a very good chance Trump will win. But polling averages suggest the popular-vote lead he had a few months ago has evaporated, even though yes, he appears to be ahead in key swing states. Betting markets still modestly favor Trump, but by much less than they did not long ago.

So if Trump’s self-aggrandizi­ng theory of the stock market were right, stocks would be falling in response to his reduced odds of victory. Instead, they’re on the rise. At a time when one side of the political divide is peddling dystopian economic fantasies, it makes sense to point to the undeniable fact that stock prices have been hitting new highs.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States