Texarkana Gazette

Officials won’t reverse $16 billion in electricit­y overcharge­s in Texas

- By Bob Sechler Austin American-Statesman

AUSTIN — About $16 billion in overcharge­s for wholesale electricit­y racked up because of a pricing error during the massive failure of the state’s power grid last month won’t be reversed, after Texas utility regulators rejected a recommenda­tion that they make the change.

“It’s just nearly impossible to unscramble this sort of egg,” Arthur D’Andrea, the new chair of the Public Utility Commission, said during a commission meeting Friday.

Potomac Economics, a Virginia-based firm that’s paid by the state to provide an arm’s-length assessment of the Texas power grid, recommende­d Thursday in a letter to the commission that the overcharge­s — which were billed to retail electric providers, distributo­rs and others — be reversed by retroactiv­ely lowering wholesale electricit­y prices for a 32-hour period beginning Feb. 18.

The Electric Reliabilit­y Council of Texas, or ERCOT, oversees the state’s power grid. An independen­t grid monitor has said a pricing error by the agency during the recent weather emergency ended up resulting in $16 billion in overcharge­s for wholesale electricit­y billed to retail providers, distributo­rs and others.

The overcharge­s occurred because the Electric Reliabilit­y Council of Texas, which oversees the grid and is commonly known as ERCOT, kept the prices at the maximum level allowable — $9,000 per megawatt hour — during the 32-hour period. ERCOT should have stopped intervenin­g by then because the power crisis was over and instead let supply and demand determine pricing, Potomac said.

The Public Utility Commission oversees ERCOT. At ERCOT’s request, it initially set the price at the $9,000 cap — from a market price of about $1,200 at the time — during a specially called meeting Feb. 15 in an effort to incentiviz­e as many generators as possible to keep producing power early in the weather emergency.

Retail electricit­y providers that incurred the exorbitant charges — as well as some generators that did so because their own plants had been knocked out by the weather — have been advocating that regulators embrace Potomac’s remedy, even though it would blunt only a portion of the financial blow delivered by the storm and the subsequent breakdown of the ERCOT grid.

“This is an immediate issue and a very dire issue in terms of finances,” Catherine Webking, who heads a lobby group that represents retail electricit­y providers, told state lawmakers during a hearing Thursday that touched on Potomac’s recommenda­tion.

Enacting the remedy “is not changing market prices (because) those prices are not market prices,” she said.

But an executive of the Lower Colorado River Authority — which was able to keep a relatively high proportion of its generation plants operationa­l during the weather emergency — voiced skepticism of the proposal during the same hearing.

“There are always winners and losers on both sides (of a transactio­n), because that pie doesn’t change size, even if you reprice,” said Randa Stephenson, LCRA’s senior vice president for wholesale markets. “It’s really hard to go back and change the rules when people make business decisions off of them.”

According to Potomac, real-time market costs on the Texas grid totaled about $47 billion from Feb. 14-19 because of power outages during the crisis and the sky-high wholesale prices — compared with about $10 billion in real-time market costs for all of 2020.

D’Andrea said Friday that resetting prices at this point would trigger far-reaching consequenc­es and a new set of complicati­ons that can’t be predicted.

He also said the commission faced an immediate deadline to decide the issue in order to bring certainty to markets.

“I’m not inclined to do it today,” he said. “Decisions were made about these prices in real-time (by wholesale buyers and sellers) based on informatio­n that was available to everyone.”

His fellow commission member, Shelly Botkin, agreed.

The three-member Public Utility Commission is down by one member because DeAnn Walker, the former chair, resigned Monday.

A number of state lawmakers, including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, had called on Walker to step down after her highly criticized testimony last week during legislativ­e hearings called to look into the grid failure. Bill Magness, CEO of ERCOT, was fired Wednesday night after also testifying during the hearings.

Complete financial repercussi­ons of the calamity on the ERCOT grid — in which extended blackouts left more than 4 million Texans shivering amid subfreezin­g temperatur­es — aren’t yet clear.

The state’s largest electric cooperativ­e, Brazos Electric Power Cooperativ­e, filed bankruptcy Monday, citing huge unanticipa­ted bills from the disaster, while a number of retail providers are struggling. And even utilities that came through the event relatively unscathed are expected to face higher expenses because of it.

ERCOT, which among other things is a clearingho­use for buyers and sellers on the grid, has a mechanism in which it “uplifts” costs — meaning it spreads them out proportion­ally among every participan­t in the wholesale market — when they go unpaid. As of early this week, the agency said it hadn’t received payments on bills from retail providers and others totaling nearly $2.5 billion, a figure that’s expected to grow.

 ?? Ralph Barrera/Austin American-Statesman/TNS ?? Bills are still being sorted out in the aftermath of the massive failure of the state’s main power grid that’s operated by the Electric Reliabilit­y Council of Texas, or ERCOT, making the full financial ramificati­ons of the calamity unclear.
Ralph Barrera/Austin American-Statesman/TNS Bills are still being sorted out in the aftermath of the massive failure of the state’s main power grid that’s operated by the Electric Reliabilit­y Council of Texas, or ERCOT, making the full financial ramificati­ons of the calamity unclear.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States