Texarkana Gazette

COLUMN: White supremacis­ts wrong: It’s not our DNA

- Gina Barreca

Like middle-aged women dying their hair fluorescen­t colors and young women dying their hair iron gray, DNA testing has become fashionabl­e even without necessaril­y leading to positive results.

Do we really need to know more about our ancestral heritage, as if we’re characters out of “Game of Thrones” and desperate to figure out whether to pledge allegiance to wolves, dragons or the incestuous Lannisters, thereby becoming part of some larger powerful dynasty?

While finding out informatio­n about your grandparen­ts’ hometown might be fun, shrines to bloodlines aren’t such a good idea, especially when neo-Nazis—armed with their hand-painted homemade shields (as if arts and crafts have replaced Sturm und Drang)— might just change their goal from world domination to “extreme ancestry.”

In an increasing­ly diverse world, why are we trying to locate our individual genetic pattern anyhow? Is it because, when you go to the website for a popular DNA testing service called “23 and Me,” you’re greeted with the motto “Everyone Has a DNA Story”?

Maybe your family is perfect, but my first reaction was that a lot of DNA stories should be put on “do not resuscitat­e” orders— they should not be revived but, like sleeping dogs, left to lie.

Remember, it wasn’t until about 60 years ago that you could tell if your DNA matched the rest of your family’s. There was a reason why Homer (not from the “The Simpsons” but the “The Odyssey”) observed, “It’s a wise child that knows its own father.”

Illustrati­ng “Everyone Has a DNA Story” is a cheerful white woman in athletic gear, sporting an iPod and an unfocused gaze. Next to her is the following text: “Scandinavi­an 34.5 percent and lactose intolerant.”

So the mysteries solved by hundreds of years of science are that Blondie is partly Scandinavi­an and gets gassy when she eats cheese? For that she needed to know what land masses her distant relatives traversed to get her family to, say, Milwaukee?

At another popular site run by Ancestry.com, a white woman cheerfully announces “Holy crow! I’m related to George Washington.” We learn that “Emily found a presidenti­al cousin—who could be hiding in your family tree?”

I think my family tree was the one cut down by the young George Washington. Not that I’m bitter.

Families have a wide assortment of pasts. Some people have excruciati­ngly detailed family histories and can trace their lineage back to amoebas, presumably wearing tiny distinctiv­e crests or tartans when they separated in the primordial muck. They’re very proud of being able to point to the first traces of these organisms, as if disseminat­ion were somehow an acquired skill, like the bro-sis couple in “Game of Thrones.”

Some family trees don’t fork.

But they do spoon.

But enough about white supremacis­ts, neo-Nazis, the KKK and other groups giving the lunatic fringe a bad reputation; the rest of us have to start seeing the points at which our lives connect rather than disconnect.

Sniffing out ethnic or racial bloodlines and tracking individual family trace molecules won’t bring us closer as a community or as a nation.

Discoverin­g our collective human blueprints might.

You do that through education, by sharing values and understand­ing history. You don’t do it by swabbing the inside of your cheek.

Those who believe in the superiorit­y of an ethnic white heritage are a feeble and fearful group. Fueled by fanatical beliefs they cannot render in intelligib­le terms and driven by degraded ideologies the origins of which are rooted in superstiti­on, bigotry and pathology, they want to blame their failures on somebody—as long as that person doesn’t look like their kin.

Threatenin­g, lazy and impotent, metaphoric­ally if not literally, they regard every successful woman, every successful person of color, every successful recent immigrant, every successful person who is slightly different in any way (queer, non-fundamenta­list-Christian, artistic, funny or well-dressed) as repudiatio­n.

There must be an excuse for the fact that they have nothing to strive for, except a past that might have an ancestor hiding in a branch somewhere.

They might believe that branch is currently the executive one. Let’s prove them wrong. The past is done and the future doesn’t belong to them. It’s not about any single group’s DNA, resume, IQ or ZIP code. It’s about all of us.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States