Southern Maryland News

Democracy requires restoratio­n of voting rights

-

While the U.S. Supreme Court regaled us with several politicall­y charged and historical­ly significan­t opinions on constituti­onal rights as it neared the end of its session last month — Maryland’s Peace Cross will stay, as will political gerrymande­ring which now can’t be touched by federal judges, but racial gerrymande­ring is still a no-no, the citizenshi­p question proposed for the 2020 Census form is gone (or maybe not), “scandalous” and “immoral” trademarks are now a go — Congressio­nal Democrats took up another right earlier this year that is equally or more important than what the nine justices delivered in an astonishin­g year of high court opinions: restoratio­n of voting rights to citizens convicted of a felony.

Sen. Ben Cardin, a Democrat from Maryland, introduced the Democracy Restoratio­n Act of 2019 (SB 1068) to restore the right to vote in federal elections to convicted felons after they’ve been released from prison. While the Senate bill has yet to get a hearing, the House Democrats earlier passed the For the People Act (HR 1) that contained a similar provision. Lest one think this is a purely partisan issue, remember that former Republican governor Bob McDonnell of Virginia and a referendum in Florida have taken on this issue on the side of restoring at least some voting rights. Back in 2016, the Maryland General Assembly overrode a Gov. Larry Hogan (R) veto to restore citizens’ rights automatica­lly upon release from prison. Now at least 16 states and the District of Columbia do it that way or don’t disenfranc­hise to begin with.

In fact, the Cardin bill and HR 1 build on the success of last November’s Florida referendum in which almost two-thirds of voters agreed to restore voting rights to up to 1.4 million formerly incarcerat­ed citizens.

They also follow in the footsteps of the bipartisan First Step Act signed into law by President Donald Trump in December which committed to law a host of other federal prison and prisoner rights reforms.

And while all that has happened, most states still completely or partially disenfranc­hise voters with convicted felonies long after they’ve paid their debt to society. It’s estimated that in 2016, 6.1 million U.S. citizens, or about 1 in 40 adults, could not vote as a result of a conviction. Astonishin­gly, only 22% of those were still sitting in prison. Twelve of the 34 states that still disenfranc­hise prisoners and former prisoners, do so for life. And while hard to believe, several states disenfranc­hise for certain misdemeano­r conviction­s.

“The United States is one of the few Western democracie­s that allow the permanent denial of voting rights for individual­s with felony conviction­s,” Cardin said in an April 9 press release announcing the details of the then recently introduced Democracy Restoratio­n Act. “Voting is a fundamenta­l right of citizenshi­p. Under our constituti­on, there is no legitimate justificat­ion for denying people who have paid their dues from having a voice in our democracy.”

Cardin has it right. Erasing people from the voter rolls for conviction­s on criminal infraction­s while they are incarcerat­ed is certainly acceptable. Keeping them from the voting booth after they’ve served their time is not only undemocrat­ic but patently counterpro­ductive to rehabilita­tion, to say someone can no longer participat­e in what is one of the most basic tenets of civic participat­ion.

Besides, the giving of a second — and third, and more — chance is one of the quintessen­tial American values to which we should all aspire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States