Santa Fe New Mexican

Congress: Stop hiding behavior, disclose it

-

As charges of sexual harassment and assault swept from Hollywood to Washington, Congress has faced questions about how it addresses such claims. The answer: terribly. For two decades, taxpayers have been underwriti­ng secret payments to people who accuse lawmakers of sexual misconduct under a 1995 law called, paradoxica­lly, the Congressio­nal Accountabi­lity Act. The legislatio­n applied to Congress many laws on workplace safety, employment and civil rights from which it had been exempt. In the process, it establishe­d an account to pay settlement­s, which prevented lawmakers from being personally liable, and created an Office of Compliance that kept charges and payments secret.

After public pressure, the Office of Compliance released a tally of the settlement­s this month: Between 1997 and the present, the office has paid more than $17 million on more than 260 claims. In keeping with Congress’ maddening lack of transparen­cy, the tally lumps harassment with discrimina­tion and other claims, so the number of harassment claims isn’t clear. It also doesn’t name any of those accused.

… Congressio­nal sexual misconduct is likely far more prevalent than the settlement figures suggest, because Congress lacks safeguards common in large institutio­ns. Lawmakers get no mandatory training in appropriat­e behavior toward their staff. Employees, many young and female, say they get little to no guidance on where to report predatory behavior. Victims who do find their way to the Compliance Office are required to undergo counseling, mediation and a 30-day “cooling off period” before filing a formal complaint.

Early this month, the Senate adopted a bipartisan resolution requiring its members and staff to participat­e in antiharass­ment and anti-discrimina­tion training; in coming days, the House is expected to follow suit. But the heavier lift is overhaulin­g how harassment complaints are handled. In the House, Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., and Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va., are leading a bipartisan push for legislatio­n that prohibits nondisclos­ure agreements as a condition of initiating a complaint, makes mediation and counseling optional before a victim can file a complaint and requires lawmakers who settle discrimina­tion cases to repay the Treasury. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., is championin­g similar legislatio­n in the Senate.

It’s sobering to recall that the 1995 law was passed three years after another congressio­nal scandal, in which House members of both parties were censured and prosecuted for abusing accounts with the House bank, in some cases writing checks for tens of thousands of dollars they didn’t have. The same environmen­t of entitlemen­t, secrecy and lax rules led to the current situation.

Decades of hushed-up complaints show sexual misconduct is as terrible an open secret in Congress as in Hollywood. Legislator­s have a chance to correct their poor handling of a national problem. They should seize it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States