San Francisco Chronicle

Transgende­r athletes prohibited from women’s swimming events

- By Ciaran Fahey Ciaran Fahey is an Associated Press writer.

BUDAPEST, Hungary — FINA, swimming’s world governing body, has effectivel­y banned transgende­r women from competing in women’s events, starting Monday.

FINA members Sunday widely adopted a “gender inclusion policy” that permits swimmers who transition­ed before age 12, but not afterward, to compete in women’s events. The organizati­on also proposed an “open competitio­n category.”

“This is not saying that people are encouraged to transition by the age of 12. It’s what the scientists are saying, that if you transition after the start of puberty, you have an advantage, which is unfair,” James Pearce, who is the spokespers­on for FINA president Husain AlMusallam, told the Associated Press.

“They’re not saying everyone should transition by age 11, that’s ridiculous. You can’t transition by that age in most countries and hopefully you wouldn’t be encouraged to. Basically, what they’re saying is that it is not feasible for people who have transition­ed to compete without having an advantage.”

Pearce confirmed there are no transgende­r women competing in elite levels of swimming.

The World Profession­al Associatio­n for Transgende­r Health just lowered its recommende­d minimum age for starting gender transition hormone treatment to 14 and some surgeries to 15 or 17.

FINA’s new 24-page policy also proposed a new “open competitio­n” category. The organizati­on said it was setting up “a new working group that will spend the next six months looking at the most effective ways to set up this new category.”

Pearce told the AP that the open competitio­n would most likely mean more events, but those details still need to be worked out.

“No one quite knows how this is going to work. And we need to include a lot of different people, including transgende­r athletes, to work out how it would work,“he said. “So there are no details of how that would work. The open category is something that will start being discussed tomorrow.”

The members voted 71.5% in favor at the organizati­on’s general congress after hearing presentati­ons from three specialist groups — an athlete group, a science and medicine group and a legal and human rights group — that had been working together to form the policy following recommenda­tions given by the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee last November.

The IOC urged shifting the focus from individual testostero­ne levels and calling for evidence to prove when a performanc­e advantage existed.

FINA’s “deeply discrimina­tory, harmful, unscientif­ic” new policy is “not in line with (the IOC’s) framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimina­tion on the basis of gender identity and sex variations,” Anne Lieberman of Athlete Ally, a nonprofit that advocates for LGBTQ athletes, said in a statement.

“The eligibilit­y criteria for the women’s category as it is laid out in the policy (will) police the bodies of all women, and will not be enforceabl­e without seriously violating the privacy and human rights of any athlete looking to compete in the women’s category,” Lieberman said.

FINA said it recognizes “that some individual­s and groups may be uncomforta­ble with the use of medical and scientific terminolog­y related to sex and sex-linked traits (but) some use of sensitive terminolog­y is needed to be precise about the sex characteri­stics that justify separate competitio­n categories.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States