San Francisco Chronicle

Trump calls probe ‘unconstitu­tional’

- By Micheal D. Shear Micheal D. Shear is a New York Times writer.

WASHINGTON — President Trump declared Monday that the appointmen­t of the special counsel in the Russia investigat­ion is “totally UNCONSTITU­TIONAL!” and asserted that he has the power to pardon himself, raising the prospect that he might take extraordin­ary action to immunize himself from the ongoing probe.

In a pair of tweets, Trump suggested that he would not have to pardon himself because he had “done nothing wrong.” But he insisted that “numerous legal scholars” have concluded that he has the absolute right to do so, a claim that vastly overstates the legal thinking on the issue.

In fact, many constituti­onal experts dispute Trump’s position on his pardon power, an issue for which there has been no definitive ruling.

Trump’s assertion that “numerous legal scholars” believe he could pardon himself ignores the one official opinion on the subject. In August of 1974, just days before former President Richard Nixon resigned, the acting head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, Mary Lawton, said in a memorandum that “it would seem” that Nixon could not pardon himself.

She wrote that such a pardon would appear to violate “the fundamenta­l rule that no one may be a judge in his own case.” But she did not explain how that principle would limit the constituti­onal power of the president to pardon.

In the wake of Trump’s tweets, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, “If I were president of the United States and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardon myself, I think I would hire a new lawyer.”

The president’s assertions came in tweets just a day after Rudy Giuliani, one of his lawyers, told HuffPost that Trump is essentiall­y immune from prosecutio­n while in office, and could even have shot the former FBI director without risking indictment while he was president.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States