San Francisco Chronicle

AT&T ads haven’t returned to YouTube yet

- By Sapna Maheshwari Sapna Maheshwari is a New York Times writer.

AT&T, one of the nation’s biggest marketers, has yet to return to YouTube nearly a year after pulling its advertisin­g because of concerns that it could appear alongside offensive material.

The company was among a wave of major marketers who paused their spending on YouTube in March after it was found that ads were appearing on videos promoting hate speech or terrorism and other disturbing content.

The Google-owned video service has since introduced a series of changes designed to limiting the types of videos that can run ads, and most brands have returned.

But that has not been enough for AT&T, which wants YouTube to get “as close to zero tolerance for this issue as possible,” Fiona Carter, the company’s chief brand officer, said in a recent interview.

“It became apparent to us as we worked through this that too much of the content our advertisin­g could appear against was not brand safe — it was objectiona­ble by any measure,” Carter said. “You really have an epiphany when you see some of that content.”

She added, “Our findings are that no matter the algorithm or the filters or the formula that you currently apply, nothing beats human review.”

AT&T believes that its dialogue with YouTube played a role in the announceme­nt last month that humans will manually vet videos from channels that are part of Google Preferred — a designatio­n applied to channels representi­ng the top 5 percent of content on YouTube that helps brands advertise on popular videos.

Over the past year, major marketers have been demanding more accountabi­lity from Google, Facebook and the rest of the digital advertisin­g ecosystem, as they have come to the conclusion that the same algorithmi­c tools that allow unpreceden­ted access to users can be used to spread misinforma­tion, hate speech and videos that are harmful to children.

On Monday, Keith Weed, chief marketing officer of Unilever, called on tech companies to take greater responsibi­lity for what appears on their sites and said his company would not invest in services “that do not protect our children or which create division in society and promote anger or hate.”

“We’ve been talking about the digital supply chain for several years but what happened last year is it became a societal issue, a people issue,” Weed said in an interview after delivering remarks on eroding trust in tech companies at an industry conference in Palm Desert.

Weed said that while he would pull dollars from the outlets “if something happened which was completely inappropri­ate for our brands or our business,” he wanted to work with the companies to improve their sites.

“What I’m not doing is giving some sort of public ultimatum,” he said.

Brian Wieser, a media analyst at Pivotal Research, said marketers are clearly having an influence.

“If they said nothing then the only thing that would cause the services to act is the risk of government regulation,” he said.

But Unilever, he said, was not taking an especially hard line with the tech companies as far as its advertisin­g budget. “It’s not like they set a threshold and said companies who don’t do this lose their money specifical­ly,” he said.

Unilever, which owns Ben & Jerry’s, Dove and other major brands, did not pull its marketing dollars from YouTube last year, saying at the time that the number of ads running with objectiona­ble content was proportion­ally small and that it would use the moment to win new concession­s from Google.

Weed reiterated that position Monday.

“What I’m talking about here is moving the conversati­on along,” he said.

Unilever, for example, has been talking with YouTube about implementi­ng more human screening of videos that include children to make sure that they are not being exploited.

“There is nothing we take more seriously than the trust and safety of our users, customers and partners, and we will continue to work to earn that trust every day,” a Google spokespers­on said of Weed’s remarks.

Even though AT&T hasn’t been spending money on YouTube ads in the past year, it has worked closely with the San Bruno company to improve its systems and is eager to have its ads again seen by YouTube’s huge audience of teen and twentysome­thing viewers. YouTube has said that its manual reviews of Google Preferred channels would be complete by the end of March.

“We’re very hopeful we can get back onto YouTube,” Carter said. “It delivers the scale we want, but we had to roll up our sleeves and find that performanc­e elsewhere.”

AT&T spent more than $1 billion on advertisin­g in the United States last year through September, while Unilever spent $644 million, according to data from Kantar Media. AT&T was the sixthbigge­st advertiser in the country during that period, and Unilever was No. 16.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States