Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Will Biden end the war in Afghanista­n? Don’t bet on it

- Steve Chapman Steve Chapman is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune. He wrote this for Creators Syndicate.

The U.S. mission in Afghanista­n is nearly old enough to buy a beer, having gone on since 2001. Two presidents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, promised it would come to an end, but the war outlasted them both.

Mr. Trump’s administra­tion negotiated a deal with the Taliban that committed us to leave by May. That obligation was convenient­ly scheduled for after the 2020 presidenti­al election, making it Joe Biden’s problem. Mr. Biden said at his news conference last week, “It’s going to be hard to meet the May 1 deadline.” But when asked if our troops would still be there next year, he said, “I can’t picture that being the case.”

Really? He served as vice president under Mr. Obama, who campaigned on a promise to get out within 16 months. Running for reelection in 2012, Mr. Obama promised to end our involvemen­t by 2014. Mr. Trump made similar promises, which were equally empty.

If Mr. Biden can’t picture our forces staying into next year and beyond, his imaginatio­n is failing him. There are powerful reasons to think they’ll be in Afghanista­n in 2022. Also in 2023. And 2024. And ...

The first reason is that there are far bigger political risks in leaving than staying. Our departure could lead to an expanded war between the Kabul regime and the Taliban, the defeat of the Afghan army and the return of the Taliban to power.

No president wants to have to answer for what could be the grim aftermath of our departure. Mr. Biden can remember the 1975 debacle following our withdrawal from Vietnam, when U.S. embassy staff in Saigon evacuated in helicopter­s as desperate Vietnamese took to the sea in rickety boats to escape. For the time being, the easiest way to avoid an embarrassi­ng outcome is to stay.

This will be particular­ly true next year, with Democrats facing midterm elections that could give Republican­s control of Congress. Critics of our endless presence in Afghanista­n — a group that includes me — may take hope from polls indicating that most Americans would like to get out sooner or later. But that sentiment carries little weight.

The great majority of people rarely give any thought to Afghanista­n. There are no protests against it or citizen lobbying campaigns to end the war. It gets minimal attention from the news media. Our troop levels are low — 3,500 — and no American has been killed in combat in more than a year.

None of these facts justifies a mission that has no prospect of success regardless of how long we stay or what we do. But Mr. Biden is shrewd enough to see that maintainin­g the status quo won’t cost him votes, while pulling out could.

Another reason he is likely to go along with an extension is that his administra­tion is staffed by creatures of the “Blob” — the network of establishm­ent foreign policy experts who favor an expansive U.S. role in the world and resist every effort to pull back even from failed interventi­ons.

His Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, supported the Iraq War as well as Mr. Obama’s interventi­on in Libya. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan was an aide to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and chief foreign policy adviser for her presidenti­al campaign. She favored both wars.

Mr. Biden’s Defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, is a retired four-star Army general. In his presidenti­al memoir, Mr. Obama recalled the resistance of the Pentagon brass to pulling out of Iraq and Afghanista­n. These officers were, he wrote, products of “a U.S. military that prided itself on accomplish­ing a mission once started, without regard to cost, duration, or whether the mission was the right one to begin with.” Austin didn’t get where he is by being a bold nonconform­ist.

Mr. Biden will probably keep slogging away in Afghanista­n as long as the basic status quo holds. Assuming the Kabul government and its military can stave off defeat, delaying our departure makes political sense.

But it won’t enhance our chances of success. If you don’t know the answers on an exam, getting an extra hour or day to finish it won’t help. It only postpones the moment when you have to confront the truth.

George W. Bush left that moment to Mr. Obama, who bequeathed it to Mr. Trump, who passed it on to his successor. Mr. Biden is likely to conclude that 1) whoever leaves Afghanista­n will bear the blame for the outcome, and 2) it won’t be him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States