After Paris attacks, U.S. security debate heats up

WASHINGTON — The attacks in Paris have renewed debate on the U.S. government’s post-Sept. 11, 2001, domestic surveillance laws, leading to efforts to revive the issue on Capitol Hill.

Sens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, both GOP presidential candidates, were on opposite sides of the debate earlier this year when Congress eliminated the National Security Agency’s bulk phone-records collection program and replaced it with a more restrictive measure to keep the records in phone companies’ hands.

Rubio, R-Fla., sided with top Republican senators in trying unsuccessfully to extend the existing program, saying that national security required it. Cruz, R-Texas, allied himself with Democrats and a few other Republicans who said the program amounted to intrusive government overreach with no security benefit and voted to remake it.

Now, with polls showing the public is growing more concerned with security after the Paris attacks this month that killed 130 people, Rubio is backing long-shot legislation aimed at keeping the intended changes from taking effect at month’s end, as scheduled. He’s also needling Cruz, who is responding just as adamantly, as the two, rising in the presidential polls, escalate their direct confrontations.

“This is not a personal attack. It’s a policy difference,” Rubio said recently in an interview in Des Moines, Iowa. He said Cruz had joined with Senate liberals and the ACLU “to undermine the intelligence programs of this country.”

“They do so under the guise of protecting our liberties,” Rubio said. “But in fact you can protect our liberties without undermining those programs.”

Cruz, in an interview, disputed Rubio’s criticism.

“I disagree with some Washington Republicans who think we should disregard and discard the constitutional protections of American citizens,” he said. “We can keep this nation safe without acquiescing to Big Brother having information about every aspect of our lives.”

Speculation about how the suspects in the Paris attacks communicated is also raising calls for Congress to take new steps on surveillance and to ensure government access to encrypted networks.

“It’s just astonishing to me how those advocates of ridding us of any government involvement in our lives have now become strangely quiet,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “Of course they’ve been proven wrong.”

The Senate agreed to the USA Freedom Act this year only after GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who’s also running for president but lags in polls, used Senate rules to force the most controversial aspect to expire briefly in a showdown with the Senate leaders.

The Freedom Act remade that element of the Patriot Act — the bulk collection program exposed by Edward Snowden, that allows the NSA to sweep up Americans’ phone records and comb through them for ties to international terrorists. On Sunday, the NSA loses the power to collect and store those records. The government still could gain court orders to obtain data connected to specific numbers from the phone companies.