Modern Healthcare

Providers sideline employees, cut pay as pandemic saps revenue

- By Shelby Livingston

AN INDUSTRY that for the past couple of years has been one of the nation's dominant job creators now finds itself at the other end of the spectrum.

Hospitals and other healthcare providers across the country say the worsening coronaviru­s pandemic, which has so far killed almost 6,700 Americans, is threatenin­g to drain them of cash. Heeding state orders, they are cutting back on lucrative and reliable, non-urgent procedures, like knee replacemen­ts and cataract surgery, to free up resources for COVID-19 patients. Other patients are canceling doctor's appointmen­ts out of fear and state shelter-in-place orders, leaving some clinicians with no work.

“I don't think anyone can point to a circumstan­ce where this level of systemic volume and revenue challenge has faced virtually every provider in the country,” said David McMillan, chief financial officer and a managing principal at consultanc­y PYA.

To stay afloat, an increasing number of hospitals and physician practices are sending staff home without pay, whittling down workers' hours, or slashing compensati­on and benefits, particular­ly in parts of the country that have not yet seen an overwhelmi­ng number of coronaviru­s-stricken patients.

Boston Medical Center last week furloughed 700 employees. Erlanger Health in Chattanoog­a, Tenn., froze retirement contributi­ons and temporaril­y laid off administra­tive workers. Atrius Health, a physician's practice in Massachuse­tts, is furloughin­g 1,100 nonclinica­l employees for a month and temporaril­y witholding a portion of pay for nearly 3,000 workers.

“It's not a decision we wanted to make nor do we take it lightly, but we have to take immediate action to ensure that we can sustain our clinical operations during and after the COVID-19 crisis ends,” Donald Lloyd, CEO of St. Claire HealthCare, explained in the Kentucky hospital system's announceme­nt that it would furlough 300 workers not directly involved in care delivery or the COVID-19 response. The system experience­d a 40% drop in gross revenue in March and expects at least a 65% drop in April, a spokeswoma­n said.

Job losses in the healthcare industry totaled 42,500 in March, according to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Ambulatory providers, including physician practices and dentists, comprised 96% of the losses.

Providers' cost-cutting moves are at odds with the circumstan­ces of hospitals in hard-hit areas like New York or Michigan, where governors have called for out-ofstate doctors and nurses to help fill staffing shortages. Meanwhile, providers outside of these so-called coronaviru­s “hot spots” are sitting idle and bracing for the moment the pandemic picks up in their communitie­s.

“The economics of hospitals are upside down because a lot of stuff they used to do that was profitable, they are no longer doing,” said Dan Mendelson, founder of healthcare consultanc­y Avalere Health. “It's now become an existentia­l issue for a lot of not-for-profit hospitals that are struggling to balance costs and expenses.”

While it didn't disclose the effects on its revenue, Prisma Health, the largest not-for-profit health system in South Carolina, said its patient volume decreased 77% while outpatient visits decreased 40% in just two weeks. That, and staggering price increases for personal protective equipment prompted it to furlough some administra­tive employees.

For-profit chains are not immune either. Tenet Healthcare Corp. last week announced it was scrapping its 2020 guidance, furloughin­g about 500 fulltime positions and issuing another $500 million in debt to boost liquidity.

Rational hospital operators would first reduce the hours of part-time and as-needed employees, then look to cut pay or workdays for the full-time and salaried workers, said Dr. Mike Schatzlein, former CEO of Ascension Health's St. Thomas Health. Furloughs would be used as a last resort, and ideally, executives would share in the pain by taking a pay cut, he said.

“The last thing they want to do is lose good associates,” he said, but ultimately, “you can't let the whole institutio­n die because of considerat­ion for associates.”

At HCA Healthcare, which ended 2019 with revenue totaling $51.3 billion, members of the senior leadership team each will take a 30% cut in pay until the pandemic is over.

While some providers are furloughin­g employees with an eye toward bringing them back, very few are laying off their workers because most believe they will soon be needed again, said Mimi Moore, a partner at law firm Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner. By and large employers are preserving workers’ health benefits while they are on furlough, but there are cases where their health insurers won’t permit it.

Some hospitals are easing anxiety by providing stability and certainty for employees. Pittsburgh-based health system UPMC ensured its staff they would continue to be paid at their current rate for normally scheduled hours through May 9, even if they are redeployed to different roles or asked not to work. “We are asking our employees to be there for the community, so this is a way to be there for our employees,” said John Galley, UPMC’s chief human resources officer.

It’s not totally clear why UPMC is able to protect pay while other systems are resorting to furloughs. The system has diversifie­d revenue from its health plan and access to cash. It sought a line of credit and several bank loans totaling $2 billion in response to the pandemic, according to rating agency S&P Global. UPMC also had $5.1 billion in unrestrict­ed cash and investment­s at the end of 2019. An S&P report shows the median for unrestrict­ed reserves among not-for-profit health systems was $1.5 billion in 2018.

Even so, UPMC will be squeezed by COVID-19 just like the rest of the industry. S&P in late March revised the sector’s outlook to negative from stable, noting the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to higher operating costs and declines in reserves.

The Coronaviru­s Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, or CARES, Act, signed into law last month will funnel $100 billion to hospitals to help with costs and lost revenue from the pandemic. The American Hospital Associatio­n has asked the federal government to quickly distribute the money directly to providers and allow them to be used for paid leave for quarantine­d or furloughed staff. Hospitals will need to track how they spend the funds so they aren’t clawed back later for being improperly used, experts said.

The AHA is also begging the largest private health insurers to provide advance payments because the government’s “actions alone cannot fill the gap resulting from reduced revenue from private insurance,” it wrote in a letter to insurer CEOs. Medicare has allowed providers to receive advance payments, and at least one commercial insurer—Blue Cross of Idaho—is giving independen­t physicians the option.

Schatzlein said resolving the shortage of personal protective equipment along with widespread testing should allow systems to return to normal operations. Testing would help providers predict and plan for when the pandemic will peak in their counties.

“We’ve got to get good at doing this,” Schatzlein said. “The issue is not: How do we live with no elective procedures for six months? We need to get to a county-by-county strategy.” ●

 ?? GETTY IMAGES/MODERN HEALTHCARE ILLUSTRATI­ON ??
GETTY IMAGES/MODERN HEALTHCARE ILLUSTRATI­ON
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States