Debunking anti-vaccine hoax about ‘vaccine shedding’
In April, faculty and staff at a small Miami private school received a letter telling them that if they chose to get the COVID-19 vaccine, they would have to keep their distance from the students. A week later, one fifth-grade student sent an email home to her parents from the school.
The teacher “is telling us to stay away from you guys,” the student wrote, according to reports.
The episode at the Centner Academy is the latest example of online misinformation seeping into the real world. School co-founder Leila Centner framed the policy as a matter of protecting the unvaccinated people from “being negatively impacted” by those who got their COVID-19 shots.
“We have at least three women with menstrual cycles impacted after having spent time with a vaccinated person,” Centner said.
The notion that the COVID-19 vaccines can be “shed” like the coronavirus itself “is a conspiracy that has been created to weaken trust” in the vaccines, said Christopher Zahn, vice president of practice activities at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
The script-flipping narrative not only dissuades people from getting the vaccine, but also seeks to isolate or punish those who have.
The misinformation has taken a hold anyway — well beyond one school in Miami. Businesses in Canada asked vaccinated customers to stick to curbside pickup. And on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, users shared warnings that serious side effects, including menstrual irregularities and infertility, can come from contact with vaccinated people.
PolitiFact talked to medical experts about what emerged in April as a prevailing narrative within the anti-vaccine community. The claims about “vaccine shedding” are not only false, but also biologically impossible given the construction of the COVID-19 vaccines.
“
COVID-19 vaccines do not ‘shed’
The notice sent out at Centner Academy stirred so much controversy that a reporter asked about it during a White House press briefing. But the facts aren't up for debate.
None of the three COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the U.S. “can possibly affect a person who has not been vaccinated, and this includes their menstruation, fertility, and pregnancy,” said Dr. Jennifer Gunter, a gynecologist who has written about the vaccines, in a blog post. “Let me be very clear. The COVID-19 vaccines cannot affect anyone by proxy.”
The vaccines use different technologies to instruct cells to make versions of one spike protein found on the coronavirus, so the immune system can mount a response to it, said Dr. Paul A. Offit, chair of vaccinology at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine.
The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines use messenger RNA, or mRNA. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses an adenovirus that's been altered to make it harmless.
In a statement, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention described the process this way:
“COVID-19 vaccines give instructions to teach our cells how to make a protein — or even just a piece of a protein — that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. After the protein piece is made, the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of them. The immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.”
The process occurs “in much the same manner that you make insulin or hemoglobin or myosin or any of the hundreds and hundreds of proteins that your body makes everyday,” Offit said.
“If I come and stand next to someone, I'm not going to catch their insulin,” he said. “They're not going to transfer insulin from them to me. That's the level of thinking.”
Some live-virus vaccines in history have “shed” the virus enough to affect others, including the oral polio vaccine and a rotavirus vaccine, experts said. The phenomenon — known as “contact immunity” — played a role in eradicating polio, because one child's vaccination could inoculate others indirectly. In rare cases, the oral polio vaccine could actually cause illness.
But the oral polio vaccine has not been used in the U.S. for years, said Kelly L. Moore, deputy director at the Immunization Action Coalition. And none of the COVID-19 vaccines authorized in the U.S. are live-virus vaccines.
No evidence vaccines cause infertility, menstruation problems
PolitiFact previously debunked social media posts that claimed exposure to vaccinated people could trigger menstrual cycles and fertility problems in unvaccinated women, along with similar posts that said the vaccines could cause death or disease in unvaccinated people by shedding.
The thinking for some of the false claims about fertility in particular is that the vaccines can stunt the recipient's ability to get pregnant, because the spike protein resembles a protein on placental cells, called syncytin-1. But the two proteins aren't similar enough to trick the immune system into attacking the placental cells.
“There isn't molecular mimicry,” Offit said. If there was, then people infected with COVID-19 would have experienced the same problem, he said.
Offit pointed to the phase-three vaccine trials as evidence that they don't hinder pregnancies.
Pfizer and Moderna did not accept people who were pregnant into their trials, and they asked participants not to get pregnant, Offit said. But some women got pregnant anyway — 36 in total across the two trials, each of which enrolled more than 30,000 participants.
“If it was true that the vaccine affected fertility, then all of those pregnancies should have been in the placebo group,” he said. “But they weren't. They were equally divided among the two groups, which is to say that the vaccines neither promoted nor negated your ability to get pregnant.”
The trials didn't reveal concerns about the vaccines' impact on menstruation, either, experts said. Some anecdotal reports of menstrual changes have since surfaced, but no study has identified the shots as the direct cause. A woman's menstrual cycle can fluctuate due to several factors, including diet, stress, exercise, illness and pregnancy, according to the Mayo Clinic.
Prominent anti-vaccine activists spread ‘shedding’ claims
Social media posts about “vaccine spreading” appeared to accelerate on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram in mid-April, according to CrowdTangle, a social media insights tool.
Jennifer Reich, a University of Colorado-Denver sociology professor who has studied vaccine hesitancy, said such misinformation can feel compelling because the vaccines are new and “people don't have a long track record with them yet.”
But Offit, who has written several books about the anti-vaccine movement, said the “shedding” narrative represents a new low.
“This is as close to a perfect vaccine as you could ever want to confront a pandemic the likes of which no one has seen,” Offit said.