Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Ex-federal agent found guilty on one count

Scharlat acquitted on 4 other sex assault counts

- Bruce Vielmetti Contact Bruce Vielmetti at (414) 2242187 or bvielmetti@jrn.com. Follow him on Twitter at @ProofHears­ay.

WAUKESHA - A jury late Friday found a former federal agent not guilty of sexually assaulting two women after a nine-day trial that featured explicit testimony from three former girlfriend­s, but guilty of assaulting a third.

David Scharlat, 55, was charged in April 2018 with five counts of sexual assault against three women over five years. Scharlat, who had steady dating relationsh­ips with all of the women, says the charged incidents were all consensual.

In her closing argument, Assistant District Attorney Michelle Hulgaard said the evidence showed Scharlat to be a predator who had no regard for the women in his life and took what he wanted from them, emotionall­y and physically. He used the authority of his badge and gun to intimidate them, she said.

She recounted the women’s emotional, explicit testimony, and reminded the jury of a domestic violence expert’s explanatio­n about why victims stay in bad relationsh­ips and don’t immediatel­y report abuse. Hulgaard pointed to how she said Scharlat exercised power and control over his girlfriend­s through threats, demeaning language, isolation and economic leverage.

In his closing argument Friday, defense attorney Paul Bucher told jurors he was no longer referring to the women as alleged victims. “They are victims,” he said, “of the government. It used them as pawns.”

He attacked the case as wrongly charged, noting that the day before, prosecutor­s amended the most serious count — first-degree sexual assault causing great bodily harm — down to third-degree, meaning sexual intercours­e without consent.

Bucher mentioned the dozens of times the women had willingly had sex with his client and suggested their claims of assault on the specific occasions didn’t make common sense. “C’mon. Seriously?” he said.

He asked the jury to acquit Scharlat, and quickly, to send a message to the government, “Don’t bring us this junk.”

All three women testified about their up-and-down relationsh­ips with Scharlat. One said it had gone on for 20 years, despite her constant fear of his volatile temper.

Another described meeting him after his persistenc­e on a dating app, and how she later felt controlled, threatened and stalked and how he forced her to perform oral sex at his home over Labor Day weekend in 2013.

The next year she persuaded Scharlat’s employer, the federal government, to investigat­e him. When she felt nothing came of it, she made a documentar­y about her story, which became available on Amazon last month.

The third had reconnecte­d with Scharlat in October 2017, three years after ending a three-year relationsh­ip, and then, she said, suffered two assaults in three days. She reported the incidents to police less than a week later. That investigat­ion led detectives to the two other women.

Scharlat did not testify, or put on any defense, but jurors did watch a recording of his three-hour interview with a Hartland police detective in 2017, which prosecutor­s played. In her closing argument, Hulgaard characteri­zed Scharlat as arrogant, angry, demeaning toward his accusers and trying to take control of the interview from the female detective.

The trial was slowed repeatedly by sniping, bickering and legal arguments between Bucher and Hulgaard. Waukesha County Circuit Judge Maria Lazar frequently admonished both lawyers.

When he was charged, Scharlat’s exact status was unclear; U.S. State Department officials indicated he was on administra­tive leave from his job as a special agent with the Diplomatic Security Services. He joined the agency in 2001 after working at the Brookfield Police Department.

He is currently disabled, Bucher said at trial.

Scharlat faced three counts of second-degree sexual assault by use or threat of force, though the jury has the option of finding him guilty of thirddegre­e sexual assault on those counts if they did not agree he is not guilty.

Two counts refer to incidents in October 2017, which the victim reported within a week. The first-degree count was amended after the forensic nurse said the woman’s injuries did not amount to serious bodily harm. It went to the jury as a third-degree charge, and the lesser-included offense of fourthdegr­ee sexual assault if jurors found there was sexual contact but not intercours­e.

The second count of third-degree sexual assault was for an incident in which prosecutor­s say the woman was extremely intoxicate­d after spending the evening with Scharlat and could not have consented to the sex they contend left woman with internal injuries.

If convicted of all charges he could have faced up to 85 years in prison.

 ??  ?? Scharlat
Scharlat

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States