Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

PolitiFact:

Walker does full flop on immigratio­n.

- By DAVE UMHOEFER dumhoefer@journalsen­tinel.com

On Feb. 4, we awarded Gov. Scott Walker a Half Flip for inconsiste­ncies in how he framed his views on what to do about millions of illegal immigrants currently in the United States.

Our focus was on Walker’s comments in light of a 2013 Wausau Daily Herald interview in which he clearly agreed “it makes sense” that people could not only stay here but get citizenshi­p with the right mix of penalties and waiting periods and other requiremen­ts.

Walker had muddied the waters in a Feb. 1 interview on ABC’s “This Week” program by declaring he was not for “amnesty” for those residents. Critics opposed to a “pathway” to legal citizenshi­p disagreed, calling his position just that.

In assigning Walker a Half Flip, which is defined by a partial change in position or inconsiste­nt statements on an issue, we noted “the truth is that we don’t really know whether he has a completely new position, because he wasn’t asked to clarify his views in detail.”

(Worth noting: Two days after we issued the Half Flip, Walker in a Fox interview accused the Wausau newspaper of misquoting him despite video proving otherwise.)

Walker’s position became a whole lot clearer in a March 1 interview with Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.”

Faced with the public perception that he was equivocati­ng on the issue, Walker tried to better define his position. That prompted us to return to the Flip-O-Meter.

Our standard disclaimer applies: The Flip-O-Meter is not designed to say whether any change in position is good policy or good politics. Rather, it strictly looks at whether a public official has been consistent in his or her stated views on a topic.

Pressed by Wallace in the interview, Walker at first continued to say he didn’t believe in amnesty, while not disavowing his endorsemen­t of a path to citizenshi­p in the 2013 Wausau interview.

Wallace: The question was, can you envision a world where if these people paid a penalty, that they would have a path to citizenshi­p? And you said, sure, that makes sense.

Walker: I believe there’s a way that you can do that . . .

But Walker switched course when Wallace persisted: Wallace: But you said you supported it. Walker: And my view has changed. I'm flat out saying it. I’m — candidates can say that. Sometimes they don’t. I'm saying my — Wallace: So, you’ve changed from 2013? Walker: Absolutely. I look at the problems we’ve experience­d for the last few years. I've talked to governors on the border and others out there. I’ve talked to people all across America. And the concerns I have is that we need to secure the border. We ultimately need to put in place a system that works. A legal immigratio­n system that works.

And part of doing this is put the onus on employers, getting them E-Verify and tools to do that. But I don't think you do it through amnesty.

So, Walker now says he’s changed his mind since agreeing that some pathway to citizenshi­p makes sense.

There may still be a bit of wiggle room in his position.

But in our view Walker’s declaratio­ns now make this a Full Flop, which we define as a complete change in position. Indeed, he agreed he had “absolutely” changed his position.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States