Debate renewed over economic benefits of Keystone pipeline
DALLAS (AP) – President Donald Trump is calling his administration’s approval of the Keystone XL pipeline a new era for American energy policy.
As expected, the State Department reversed a decision by the Obama administration and favored energy development over environmentalists’ objections to the pipeline, which will carry thick Canadian crude oil to Nebraska, where it can flow on to refineries along the Gulf Coast.
Trump on Friday called it “a great day for American jobs.” The costs and benefits of the pipeline have been hotly debated, however, and many experts believe it will have only a small impact on the U.S. economy. ——— JOBS The company proposing the pipeline, Calgary-based TransCanada Corp., estimates the project could create up to 6,500 construction jobs for two years. In a 2014 report, the State Department projected the pipeline would support 3,900 in construction jobs.
Including work indirectly related to the construction, the number of jobs balloons to 42,100, the State Department estimated. But once the pipeline is fin- Associated Press ished, it will create just 35 permanent jobs, according to the report. ——— ECONOMIC IMPACT The State Department estimated that construction of Keystone XL would contribute $3.4 billion to the nation’s output. That’s about 0.02 percent of the $18 trillion U.S. economy. ——— TAXES The State Department estimated that Keystone XL would generate $70 million in new state and local taxes along the route during construction and $55.6 million in property taxes once oil starts flowing. ——— COSTS Environmental groups say TransCanada overstates the economic benefits of the pipeline and lowballs the impact of using tar-sands oil. They say it generates more carbon emissions to refine the heavy, thick crude than to process other oil types.
A civil engineer at the University of Nebraska said that TransCanada also significantly underestimated the chance of a major oil spill from the 36inch-diameter pipeline.