Los Angeles Times

U.S. to allow elephant trophy hunting

Gun groups cheer the shift from Obama-era ban. Animal rights activists are outraged.

- By Matt Pearce matt.pearce@latimes.com Twitter: @mattdpearc­e

Partially reversing an Obama-era ban, the Trump administra­tion will now allow U.S. hunters to bring home the remains of elephants they’ve killed in Zimbabwe and Zambia in southern Africa.

The move, announced this week, was greeted with cheers by hunters and firearms groups but was derided by animal rights advocates as the government argued that conditions for elephants in parts of Africa had “changed and improved” in recent years.

The sides starkly disagree over whether the move helps or hurts elephant conservati­on efforts in the long run, with one animal advocacy group already threatenin­g to sue the Trump administra­tion over the decision.

African elephants are a “threatened” species protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, which limits American hunters bringing back trophies — body parts — unless “the killing of the trophy animal will enhance the survival of the species.”

Hunter groups argue that pricey exotic-animal hunting trips help elephants by providing tourism revenue to African nations that bolsters conservati­on programs.

Animal rights advocates say that encouragin­g trophy imports only encourages more hunters to kill elephants. African elephants have lost more than 50% of their range across the African continent since 1979, and have been slaughtere­d for trophy hunting and their ivory tusks, which are banned from internatio­nal trade.

African savanna elephants saw their population decline 30% between 2007 and 2014, according to a wildlife survey called the Great Elephant Census.

Under the Obama administra­tion, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service suspended elephant trophy imports in 2014 from Zimbabwe and Tanzania. The agency singled out Tanzania for “questionab­le management practices, a lack of effective law enforcemen­t and … uncontroll­ed poaching and catastroph­ic population declines.”

In Zimbabwe, “limited” data suggested there had been “a significan­t decline in the elephant population,” the agency said in its 2014 announceme­nt. (The Obama administra­tion decided to allow trophy exports in Zambia in 2012, but then Zambia’s government temporary suspended trophy hunting.)

Gun groups protested the Obama administra­tion’s decision as hasty. The National Rifle Assn. and the Safari Club Internatio­nal, a hunters’ advocacy group, tried to block the bans in court, arguing the government failed to gather enough data to make its decision.

But Trump’s election in 2016 has brought a friendlier administra­tion into office for the groups, which predominan­tly support Republican­s. (Trump’s sons have hunted exotic animals in the past, and Donald Trump Jr. has been photograph­ed holding up the severed tail of an elephant.)

On Tuesday, the Fish and Wildlife Service announced at the African Wildlife Consultati­ve Forum in Tanzania — an event co-hosted by Safari Club Internatio­nal — that the trophy bans on Zimbabwe and Zambia were being lifted, though the ban in Tanzania would remain in place.

The hunters group said it was “honored” that the wildlife service made the announceme­nt at its event. The group’s president, Paul Babaz, added in a statement, “We appreciate the efforts of the Service and the U.S. Department of the Interior to remove barriers to sustainabl­e use conservati­on for African wildlife.”

The Fish and Wildlife Service said that officials in Zimbabwe had strengthen­ed conservati­on programs in recent years and that newer data showed that more than 80,000 elephants lived in Zimbabwe.

In a statement, the Fish and Wildlife Service said that “legal, well-regulated sport hunting” can incentiviz­e African communitie­s “to conserve those species and by putting muchneeded revenue back into conservati­on.”

But the announceme­nt drew a quick backlash.

“Trophy hunting causes immense suffering and fuels the demand for wild animal products,” said World Animal Protection, an internatio­nal animal rights nonprofit.

One of President Trump’s supporters in conservati­ve media, Fox News host Laura Ingraham, marked her skepticism on Twitter: “I don’t understand how this move by @realDonald­Trump Admin will not INCREASE the gruesome poaching of elephants.”

The Center for Biological Diversity, an animal rights nonprofit, threatened to sue, with senior attorney Tanya Sanerib calling the administra­tion’s timing “bizarre” and “shocking” due to the ongoing coup d’etat in Zimbabwe.

“With tanks in the streets, whoever is actually running the Zimbabwe government just can’t be trusted to protect elephants from slaughter by poachers,” Sanerib said in a statement.

The Trump administra­tion plans to start reissuing trophy permits for Zimbabwe on Friday. U.S. hunters can only legally bring back two elephant trophies per year.

 ?? Tsvangiray­i Mukwazhi Associated Press ?? ELEPHANTS in Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe in 2015. Hunter groups and animal rights advocates disagree about whether the taking of trophies helps elephant conservati­on efforts in the long run.
Tsvangiray­i Mukwazhi Associated Press ELEPHANTS in Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe in 2015. Hunter groups and animal rights advocates disagree about whether the taking of trophies helps elephant conservati­on efforts in the long run.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States