Los Angeles Times

Senate revisits major aspects of plan

Lawmakers may seek to eliminate property tax deductions and delay corporate cut to limit deficit growth.

- By Lisa Mascaro and Jim Puzzangher­a

WASHINGTON — As they prepare to unveil their own sweeping tax plan, Senate Republican­s are revisiting key provisions of the GOP House proposal, including possibly eliminatin­g property tax deductions as well as state income tax deductions, increasing the size of child-care credits, offering more help to small businesses and having corporate tax cuts phase in or expire, according to those familiar with the negotiatio­ns.

The final outline of the Senate plan, scheduled to be released Thursday, remained a work in progress, officials cautioned.

“Everything is on the table,” one Republican official, who did not want to be identified discussing the talks, said Tuesday evening.

House and Senate Republican­s agreed on an early framework for the tax overhaul — lowering corporate rates to 20% and consolidat­ing individual brackets.

But as House Republican­s push ahead with a vote next week on their bill, Senate Republican­s are constraine­d by Senate rules that require their package not increase the federal deficit by more than $1.5 trillion over a decade.

Core to the Senate’s dilemma is how to make the

corporate tax rates immediate and permanent — as President Trump wants — which has left them searching for revenue streams so they don’t add to the deficit.

They are considerin­g various options: Fully repealing state and local tax deductions that are important to California and other hightax states, including property taxes; adjusting individual tax brackets so higher-income households that earn less than $1 million fall in the top 39.6% rate; retaining some type of estate tax; or repealing parts of Obamacare.

They are also considerin­g simply allowing the corporate rate to expire at the end of the decade, sources said.

At the same time, senators are trying to make the bill more beneficial to small businesses and middle-income households, in response to Democratic complaints that the bill mostly aids corporatio­ns and the wealthy.

President Trump interrupte­d his Asian trip Tuesday to dial in to a meeting of 12 Democratic senators he is hoping to win over, telling them it was an “awful” bill for rich people, according to a source familiar with the call.

Senators in recent days have responded to concerns raised by the National Federation of Independen­t Businesses that few smallbusin­ess owners would benefit from a provision in the House plan to lower the tax rate on so-called passthroug­h businesses to 25%. Currently such businesses pay at the individual rate, topping at 39.6%

But the vast majority of small businesses already pay about 25%, the NFIB complained.

Some senators are talking about raising the House bill’s 30% cap on business income that can receive the 25% rate to 50% or more.

Others want to increase the child tax credit to help families. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, working with Ivanka Trump, wants the credit increased to $2,000. The House bill, which would boost the credit from $1,000 to $1,600, “falls short,” he said.

Senators are also hearing from lobbyists who want to reverse certain provisions in the House bill, such as restoring an adoption tax credit supported by evangelica­l Christians.

“This is just like Republican­s not to think this through and put it on the backs of orphaned kids,” said Jim Daly, president of Focus on the Family. “Can we just have a little bit of heart?”

Representa­tives for the Koch brothers are planning to target a complicate­d excise tax in the House bill that affects foreign transactio­ns of multinatio­nal companies.

But such changes would increase costs substantia­lly, forcing senators to search for new ways to raise revenue, such as delaying the corporate tax cut, which takes place immediatel­y under the House version.

Senators are also likely to give up hopes of a full repeal of the estate tax, paid mostly by the wealthy. The House plan doubles the exemption to $22 million for couples and eventually repeals it fully after six years.

Senators may also propose a full repeal of deductions for state and local income taxes, including property taxes, according to those close to the talks. That idea would hit high-tax states like California hard and pose political challenges for many GOP House members from such states.

The House bill caps property tax deductions at $10,000, but eliminates deductions for state and local income or sales taxes. That compromise arose after Republican lawmakers from New York and New Jersey threatened to withhold their support for the GOP plan.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz came out against the House plan to restrict state and local tax deductions, calling it unfair.

“There are some taxpayers who are losing exemptions — particular­ly in some high-tax states like New York or California — that could conceivabl­y be paying higher taxes,” Cruz said. “I think that is a mistake. I think tax reform needs to cut taxes for everybody.”

But his solution may only complicate the tax bill’s path to passage. Cruz on Tuesday threw his support behind an idea already endorsed by Trump and others to pay for the tax cuts by repealing parts of the Affordable Care Act, particular­ly the mandate that all Americans have health insurance.

Doing away with the mandate would cut federal spending on subsidies that help lower-income Americans buy insurance under the law.

Tacking an Obamacare repeal onto the tax overhaul has been panned by House Speaker Paul D. Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. They worry it would complicate passage and risk derailing a year-end legislativ­e accomplish­ment.

But even with Trump’s backing, repealing parts of Obamacare is unlikely to find much support in the Senate, especially from those Republican­s, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (RAlaska), who voted earlier this year against GOP proposals to scrap the law.

“You’ve already got a lot of weighty and considerab­le issues on the tax side, so when you mix healthcare in, you may unnecessar­ily complicate it,” she said.

Meanwhile, lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee continued debating their bill Tuesday.

It aims to simplify the tax code by ending many common deductions, replacing them with a standard deduction of $12,000 for individual­s or $24,000 for couples. It would also limit mortgage deductions to interest on the first $500,000 borrowed, and end mortgage deductions for second homes.

Outside analysts warn against GOP claims that tax cuts will spur economic growth, covering the $1.5 trillion in additional deficit spending.

On Tuesday, Fitch Ratings said the proposal would likely deliver “a modest and temporary spur to growth,” but result in a federal deficit that hits 4% of GDP by next year, up from 3.5% in fiscal 2017.

“Tax cuts may lead to a short-lived boost to output, but Fitch believes that they will not pay for themselves or lead to a permanentl­y higher growth rate,” the ratings firm said.

Similarly, the nonpartisa­n Tax Foundation found that while the plan would generate nearly 1 million new jobs, the economic growth would not be sufficient to cover the $1.5-trillion cost of lost revenue.

In the Senate, Republican­s including Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), among others, have raised concerns about relying on deficit spending to pay for tax breaks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States