Los Angeles Times

Saving water, paying more

Because L.A. residents are using less, DWP plans to charge more

- By Matt Stevens and Alice Walton

L.A. water customers will see an added monthly charge due to declining revenues, caused by their water-conserving measures.

Under orders to slash their water use in the fourth year of a statewide drought, Los Angeles residents and businesses have largely risen to the challenge.

But this week, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power officials said that because its customers have done such a good job saving, the agency is short on revenue.

To help fill in the gap, the Board of Water and Power Commission­ers approved a passthroug­h charge that will require an average customer to pay about $1.80 more a month, beginning in 2016.

“We have no other way of recovering the revenue to maintain the system for our customers,” Neil Guglielmo, director of budget, rates and financial planning for the DWP, said Wednesday.

The DWP fell about $111 million short of its revenue projection in the fiscal year that closed this summer, in part because Los Angeles residents and businesses reduced their water consumptio­n about 10% more than expected, officials said.

The 18 billion gallons of unsold water left the utility about $57 million in the hole. Officials say they need that

money — about $380 million in total — to cover fixed costs such as pipe repairs, aqueduct maintenanc­e and continued operation of watertreat­ment facilities. A city ordinance allows the utility to recover those costs from customers using a so-called water revenue adjustment factor.

Guglielmo emphasized that even with the rate adjustment, the average waterconsc­ious customer is still saving money: about $3.26 each month compared with fiscal year 2013-14. Back then, officials say, customers were using more water each month and paying for the added use.

“If they’ve conserved, they’re still going to save on their bill,” Guglielmo said.

The water agency has used its adjustment tool periodical­ly since it was establishe­d in 1993 after another California drought. The commission­ers last approved an adjustment in 2011, which took effect the following calendar year.

The DWP is not the only water agency to struggle with revenue shortages tied to conservati­on. Some water districts want to double their basic service charge. Others have implemente­d “drought surcharges” to help cover costs.

“When sales go down, you can end up in the red,” Ellen Hanak, director of the Water Policy Center of the Public Policy Institute of California, said in a previous interview. “It can be tricky in the near term.”

Heather Cooley, water program director of the Pacific Institute, said that even when demand for water decreases (as it has in L.A.), a utility’s operations and maintenanc­e costs usually remain about the same. Those costs are then spread out among fewer units of water, making each gallon more expensive, even as a customer’s overall water bill goes down.

That paradox can be difficult for customers to “wrap their heads around,” Cooley said in a recent interview. “Then it becomes a problem of communicat­ion.”

Guglielmo said he and his team are constantly adjusting their revenue targets for future years and building conservati­on into their projection­s. It’s impossible to know for sure whether an adjustment will be necessary next year, but, Guglielmo said, “We hope we don’t have to use it.”

The 3.6% adjustment approved Tuesday expires at the end of 2016. But DWP officials have spent much of the last year advocating for a much broader rate hike, which would change how customers are charged for water and increase a typical residentia­l customer’s bill by about 3.4% each year for five years.

On Wednesday, DWP officials sent an email to customers promoting two online videos that make the case for the five-year rate hike. The videos have been part of the utility’s presentati­on to Angelenos since the summer.

The first explains the need to upgrade the city’s power infrastruc­ture, while the second lays out the details of the rate proposal. By the end of the year, DWP representa­tives expect to have participat­ed in 45 community presentati­ons on the rate hikes.

Officials are expected to bring the five-year plan before the board by mid-December. It would require additional approvals before it could take effect as early as next spring.

In a statement, the DWP urged its customers to share the videos online using the hashtag #LADWP, but a search of #LADWP posts shows Angelenos complainin­g about power outages — and the recent pass-through water charge.

“#LADWP hikes rates because they aren’t making enough revenue. We’re saving water like we’re supposed to,” one user tweeted. “U mad? I am.”

 ?? Al Seib
Los Angeles Times ?? PARTLY because Angelenos cut their water consumptio­n about 10% more than expected, with conservati­on efforts such as installing drought-resistant yards, the DWP fell about $111 million short of its revenue projection in the fiscal year that ended this...
Al Seib Los Angeles Times PARTLY because Angelenos cut their water consumptio­n about 10% more than expected, with conservati­on efforts such as installing drought-resistant yards, the DWP fell about $111 million short of its revenue projection in the fiscal year that ended this...
 ?? Allen J. Schaben
Los Angeles Times ?? OFFICIALS say they need to cover fixed costs such as pipe repairs and aqueduct maintenanc­e. A city law allows the utility to recover those costs from customers.
Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times OFFICIALS say they need to cover fixed costs such as pipe repairs and aqueduct maintenanc­e. A city law allows the utility to recover those costs from customers.
 ?? Robert Gauthier
Los Angeles Times ?? THE RATE HIKE by DWP, above, will require an average customer to pay about $1.80 more a month, but conservati­on efforts will still save money, an official said.
Robert Gauthier Los Angeles Times THE RATE HIKE by DWP, above, will require an average customer to pay about $1.80 more a month, but conservati­on efforts will still save money, an official said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States