Las Vegas Review-Journal

Report on stadium’s opening scuttled

Suggestion of Raiders game Aug. 6, 2020, was faulty, board told

- By Richard N. Velotta Las Vegas Review-journal

For a couple of hours Thursday, it sounded as if the Las Vegas Raiders would have their first preseason game in the new stadium Aug. 6, 2020. Not quite.

A report issued to the Las Vegas Stadium Authority board of directors Thursday said substantia­l completion of the 65,000-seat indoor stadium was moved from July 31, 2020, to Aug. 4, 2020, and the venue’s first event would occur shortly thereafter. But Las Vegas Stadium Co. Chief Operating Officer Don Webb assured everyone nothing had changed with the completion date and that everything was still on schedule despite some recent snags in the delivery of steel components to the stadium site.

Webb said he was perplexed as to why the misinforma­tion was reported.

“I was mystified when I found out they had said that because I’m quite familiar with the schedule. I sign off on any changes to that schedule, and the schedule still shows that we’ll have substantia­l completion on July 31,” Webb

told the stadium board.

He theorized that one of the project’s oversight monitors, Jones Lang Lasalle, misinterpr­eted a graphic showing the milestone completion date in August on a scheduling chart.

“They also, by the way, in the course of that, somehow deduced that the first game would be played on Aug.

6,” Webb said. “I don’t know how on earth they would be able to discern that because we don’t even know what this year’s schedule is, let alone the schedule in 2020. So both of those are absolutely wrong. I’m here to say without any uncertaint­y that we’ll finish on July 31, not Aug. 4, and I’m fairly certain our first game won’t be on Aug. 6.”

Stadium Authority Chairman Steve Hill said the authority is “good with anywhere between July 31 and Aug.

4.”

Steel delivery Concerns

Concerns about steel delivery were also raised.

An independen­t constructi­on monitor hired by the authority said some steel work has not been completed as scheduled, but, for now, it doesn’t appear that will result in any constructi­on delays.

“During our site visits, we observed that steel components that should have been completed have not yet been erected or detailed,” said a report from constructi­on monitor Grand Canyon Developmen­t Partners.

It was noted that fabricatio­n of certain pieces of steel have been late to the site, causing likely delays in work.

“This situation has been addressed with (the constructi­on subsidiary) and the contractor. The contractor has taken actions to mitigate and reconcile the delay in steel erection to ensure an on-time project completion.”

Webb has said in the past that when components have been delayed in arriving to the site at Interstate 15 and Russell Road, contractor­s simply realign the schedule and complete something else with all the flexibilit­y within the checklist of more than 18,000 tasks to complete.

“The contractor presented to us details of various options to accelerate and mitigate the current steel

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States