Houston Chronicle

Working moms’ winter math is getting tougher

- By Kathryn Anne Edwards Kathryn Anne Edwards is an economist at the Rand Corp. and a professor at the Pardee Rand Graduate School. This piece was originally published by Bloomberg.

The expected “tripledemi­c” — a concurrent winter surge in COVID, flu and respirator­y syncytial virus infections — promises to be tough on everyone. But spare a thought for the millions of working mothers who remain disproport­ionately responsibl­e for raising children and who must make room for the tripledemi­c in their careers.

No one can work and take care of sick kids at the same time — and children get sick a lot. But in the world the pandemic has wrought, it’s a whole new experience, especially for those with children under age 6.

For one, finding child care is harder than ever. Employment in the sector is still 9 percent below what it was in January 2020 — a good proxy for how many fewer spots there are in day-care centers and preschools. And the prospects of attracting more workers isn’t great: The typical annual pay is a mere $27,000 a year, even though child care costs more than public universiti­es in many states.

Even finding a place to care for one’s kids is no solution, thanks to the health protocols implemente­d since the pandemic. Temperatur­e checks, contact screenings and exclusion symptoms conspire to ensure that children will nonetheles­s spend many days at home. If you’re looking for COVID among the pre-K set, you’re bound to find a lot of other disqualify­ing illnesses, too.

All this changes what I call winter mom math: Estimating the days of work to be lost because of a child’s illness. Consider my own toddler’s experience in 2022. Since last Christmas, his teacher has gotten COVID (seven days lost), he has had a few colds (six days), there was a COVID case in his class (five days), he got COVID (10 days), he got hand-foot-mouth (five days), he got hand-foot-mouth again (five days), he had a skin irritation that required a doctor’s note (one day). Just last week, he got RSV (five days).

That’s already 44 out of the year’s 260 workdays: My 2-yearold skimmed 17 percent off the top before we reached Thanksgivi­ng. My husband and I split the days, but 8.5 percent of days lost isn’t nothing. And we recently had another kid.

The days lost to child care compound the obstacles that women already face at the office. Mothers are perceived to be less competent simply because they are mothers, a bias that affects both hiring and pay. Yet if they’re indisputab­ly competent, they’re instead seen as cold, less likable or even hostile. Granted, if mothers choose to work less, they might fairly be perceived as less committed, but they typically have little choice: Day-care centers don’t appreciate it if they work late, and sick children don’t take care of themselves.

Add the lack of paid parental leave, guaranteed sick days or subsidized child care, and it’s little surprise that having a child in the U.S. is associated with a permanent 20-30 percent drop in women’s total lifetime earnings potential. This “motherhood penalty” accounts for at least half of the gender pay gap.

In the coming months, the tripledemi­c will pull a lot of working mothers out of the office for days at a stretch. Some automatic out-of-office emails might already be in your inbox. They will miss meetings, work trips, assignment­s and opportunit­ies. One request for their managers and co-workers: Judge them for the work they do, not for the work they miss.

 ?? ?? H John Voorhees III/Hearst Connecticu­t Finding child care is harder than ever for working parents.
H John Voorhees III/Hearst Connecticu­t Finding child care is harder than ever for working parents.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States