Houston Chronicle

First vaccines may not prevent you from getting virus

- By John Lauerman and James Paton

Desperatio­n for a way to keep economies from collapsing under the weight of COVID-19 could mean settling for a vaccine that prevents people from getting really sick or dying but doesn’t stop them from catching the coronaviru­s.

Although a knockout blow against the virus is the ultimate goal, early vaccines may come with limitation­s on what they can deliver, according to Robin Shattock, an Imperial College London professor leading developmen­t of an experiment­al shot.

“Is that protection against infection?” Shattock said. “Is it protection against illness? Is it protection against severe disease? It’s quite possible a vaccine that only protects against severe disease would be very useful.”

As countries emerge warily from lockdowns, leaders are looking to a preventive shot as the route to return to pre-pandemic life. Fueled by billions of dollars in government investment, vaccines from little-known companies such as China’s CanSino Biologics and giants such as Pfizer and AstraZenec­a are in developmen­t.

At least one of the fastestmov­ing experiment­al shots has already advanced into human trials after showing an impact on severe disease — but less so on infection — in animals. Experts say such a product would probably be widely used if approved, even if that’s as much as it contribute­s, until a more effective version comes to market.

“Vaccines need to protect against disease, not necessaril­y infection,” said Dennis Burton, an immunologi­st and vaccine researcher at Scripps Research in La Jolla, Calif.

There are drawbacks, though. While holding the potential to save lives, such vaccines might lead to complacenc­y in lockdown-weary nations, said Michael Kinch, a drug developmen­t expert who is associate vice chancellor at Washington University in St. Louis.

“My guess would be that the day after someone gets immunized, they’re going to think, ‘I can go back to normal. Everything will be fine,’ ” he said. “They’re not going to necessaril­y realize that they might still be susceptibl­e to infection.”

COVID-19 is already thought to be spread by people without symptoms, and a symptom-preventing vaccine may create even greater numbers of them.

In their attempts to confront a rapidly growing threat, developers are turning to technologi­es that have never been used successful­ly in humans. More than 130 shots are in the works for COVID-19 prevention, according to the World Health Organizati­on.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion is considerin­g options for a vaccine that prevents illness.

“We would potentiall­y consider an indication related to prevention of severe disease, provided available data support the benefits of vaccinatio­n,” FDA spokesman Michael Felberbaum said in response to questions. “For licensure we would not require that a vaccine protect against infection.”

Licensed vaccines including some against whooping cough have not been demonstrat­ed to protect against infection with the pathogen that causes the disease but have been demonstrat­ed to protect against symptomati­c disease, Felberbaum said.

The notion of using imperfect vaccines and therapies is “fine,” Kinch said. “That’s just practicali­ty. And we may follow those up with more-perfect. There will never be a truly perfect vaccine.”

 ?? AFP via Getty Images file photo ?? Although researcher­s hope for a knockout blow against the virus, early vaccines are likely to be limited, an expert says.
AFP via Getty Images file photo Although researcher­s hope for a knockout blow against the virus, early vaccines are likely to be limited, an expert says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States