Houston Chronicle Sunday

ONE’S SQUABBLING; ONE’S SCATTERED

Blame fragmented message if party’s momentum fails

- By Lily Seglin

Public relations doesn’t have the best reputation in politics. Former White House Communicat­ions Director Hope Hicks was criticized for having a background in PR, which is often linked to spinning falsehoods or cleaning up after scandals.

However, a viable public relations strategy is essential for winning elections and passing key policies. The primary runoffs in Texas are the perfect time for the Democratic Party to reconsider its strategy for the upcoming midterm elections.

There’s no doubt anti-Trump sentiment provides a foundation for electoral success, but it’s not enough on its own to win elections. Not only have Democrats made frequent PR missteps that could cost them dearly at the polls, but they have no overarchin­g strategy or cohesive narrative to sell. But not all hope is lost — there are concrete steps leadership can take to gain considerab­le seats this November.

A basic tenet of public relations is creating a communicat­ions game plan that links to an overarchin­g narrative. Right now, Democrats’ talking points jump all over the place, from immigratio­n to Russia to guns and back again, with the only common refrain being “Donald Trump is terrible.” The different strands don’t fit together in any cohesive way. These issues are important, but they don’t flow into any larger framework, and candidates aren’t making connection­s between issues. Each idea is forgotten as soon as it leaves the news cycle, with the exception being gun control, a debate driven mainly by students, not political leaders.

A better strategy would be for Democrats to focus on the underlying ideas that drive the platform in order to build a narrative of an ideal society. An inspiring narrative is essential to motivating voters, coordinati­ng grassroots campaigns and linking those campaigns across a state. Ideally, this will foster voters who, when they develop positive feelings about one Democratic candidate, will transfer those feelings to other party candidates.

Democrats also must learn how to create authentici­ty across social media. Currently, too many sound like they have spent far too much time in focus groups. Every speech or tweet sounds like it was created by a speechwrit­er and vetted by at least five staff members. This slickness can make potential voters feel like their lives

aren’t understood and that no one is listening to them. Authentici­ty inspires passion and is hard to fake. But politician­s misunderst­and social media and its goal, which is not messaging, but rather authentic interactio­ns.

That’s why the party must embrace social media. Politician­s must control their own Twitter accounts. Some, like Sens. Cory Booker and Chris Murphy, clearly run their twitter accounts, letting followers see their values and personalit­ies, as well as their sense of humor. Politician­s must also develop a personal brand. They should feel free to be themselves, but with an understand­ing of their audience.

Democrats must engage with the activists in their base. In Texas, grassroots excitement has created a vocal opposition to the re-election of Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, allowing opponent Rep. Beto O’Rourke to raise $6.7 million in the first quarter of 2018. Yet outside Texas, Democratic politician­s are leaving activists out of policy and political decisions. A primary goal of political communicat­ion motivation of the base, but in this case, the base is ready for action. It’s a missed opportunit­y and suggests that leaders do not really care about what their supporters think, which is a particular­ly risky message to send as the party moves from primaries to the general election.

The Democratic Party, although out of power, isn’t pow- erless. There are several opportunit­ies for political leaders to seize the moment, but PR mistakes could stand in their way. While these problems may seem small now, it may seriously damage odds of an electoral victory in 2018.

 ?? Chris Van Es ??
Chris Van Es
 ?? Chris Van Es ??
Chris Van Es

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States