Hartford Courant

New laws could outlaw racially motivated 911 calls

- By Jaweed Kaleem Los Angeles Times

The hashtag “Living While Black” went viral on social media in the last two years as videos proliferat­ed of incidents around the nation in which white people called police on black people going about their everyday activities.

The most well-publicized episodes came last year, including two black men confronted by Philadelph­ia police after asking to use a Starbucks bathroom without first having made a purchase; a black Yale graduate student questioned by cops for napping in a dorm common room; and a black man in Oakland, Calif., whose wife filmed his encounter with a woman who dialed 911 to say he was illegally barbecuing in a park.

A lesser known one took place in 2017 in Grand Rapids, Mich., on a June afternoon when squad cars showed up at a public park during a graduation party. The event was permitted, the attendees were mostly black, and they said a noise complaint against them was really about white residents who were uncomforta­ble with a large gathering of black people. That instance, and another last September in which police handcuffed two unarmed black 11-year-old brothers after a phone call reported a teen with a gun, added to complaints about race and 911 calls.

Now, the city of 200,000 could be among the first in the country to make such calls illegal. A proposed ordinance would make it a “criminal misdemeano­r to racially profile people of color for participat­ing in their lives” and subject people behind those 911 calls to a $500 fine.

“A policy like this makes it so people have to think about whether their decision to call 911 is grounded in something significan­t,” said Senita Lenear, a Grand Rapids city commission­er who is the first black person in her position. “Our resources can’t be wasted on police addressing nonissues. You can’t ignore that people of color are the ones who have been victimized ... That is a part of a pattern.”

The debate in Grand Rapids joins efforts to either outlaw or discourage similar calls introduced by elected officials in Oregon and New York.

In Oregon, state Rep. Janelle Bynum was going door to door in her district outside Portland to speak to constituen­ts in July when a resident called police on her because she looked “suspicious.” Now, Bynum, the state’s only black legislator, is backing a bill that would allow victims of racially biased 911 calls about noncrimes to sue the callers in small claims court for up to $250.

“I thought my incident was isolated and odd, but as time went on I realized, no, it’s not,” said Bynum, a Democrat. “My goal has always been to spark a conversati­on on issues, especially in Oregon where people don’t have a great understand­ing of civil rights history.”

Bynum’s proposal recently passed the state’s House and a Senate committee. In Grand Rapids, the proposed ordinance has received a mix of support and criticism at City Commission meetings.

Ronal Serpas, a criminal justice professor at Loyola University New Orleans, questioned whether the potential laws would discourage people from calling police when there are real crimes.

“We don’t want to thwart people from calling when they think there is something suspicious in their neighborho­od,” he said. “But we don’t want it to be a racial proxy. We can do both. Whether we need new laws, I don’t know.”

 ?? MICHAEL BRYANT/AP 2018 ?? Activist Asa Khalif, left, demanded the manager of a Philadelph­ia Starbucks be fired.
MICHAEL BRYANT/AP 2018 Activist Asa Khalif, left, demanded the manager of a Philadelph­ia Starbucks be fired.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States