Enterprise-Record (Chico)

McCarthy, other GOP lawmakers escalate standoff with Jan. 6 panel

- By Farnoush Amiri and Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON » Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy is making it clear that he will likely defy a subpoena from the House committee investigat­ing the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, escalating a standoff with the panel over his and other GOP lawmakers’ testimony.

In an 11-page letter to the panel Friday, an attorney for McCarthy argued that the select committee does not have the authority to issue subpoenas to the lawmakers under House rules and demanded answers to a series of questions and documents if his client were to comply.

Attorney Elliot Berke requested a list of “topics that the Select Committee would like to discuss with the Leader, and the constituti­onal and legal rationale justifying the request.”

“I expressly reserve Leader McCarthy’s right to assert any other applicable privilege or objection to the Select Committee’s subpoena,” Berke wrote.

Committee spokespers­on Tim Mulvey responded Friday evening, “Leader McCarthy and other Members who have been served subpoenas are hiding behind debunked arguments and baseless requests for special treatment.”

He added, “The refusal of these Members to cooperate is a continued assault on the rule of law and sets a dangerous new precedent that could hamper the House’s ability to conduct oversight in the future.” Mulvey said committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., “will formally respond to these Members in the days ahead.”

The House panel believes testimony from the Republican lawmakers is crucial to their investigat­ion as each of the men was in contact with thenPresid­ent Donald Trump and his allies in the weeks and days leading up to the Capitol insurrecti­on. Some participat­ed in meetings

and urged the White House to try to overturn the 2020 presidenti­al results.

McCarthy has acknowledg­ed he spoke with Trump on Jan. 6 as Trump’s supporters were beating police outside the Capitol and forcing their way into the building. But he has not shared many details. The committee requested informatio­n about his conversati­ons with Trump “before, during and after” the riot.

His apparent defiance presents a new challenge for the committee after lawmakers decided to take the extraordin­ary and politicall­y risky step of subpoenain­g their own colleagues.

“For House Republican leaders to agree to participat­e in this political stunt would change the House forever,” the California lawmaker wrote Thursday in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal with GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio.

The committee now must decide whether to enforce the subpoenas even as it looks to wrap up the investigat­ion and prepare for a series of public hearings in early June. It could refer the lawmakers to the House ethics committee or take steps to hold them

in contempt. The subpoenas were issued to McCarthy, Jordan, and Reps. Scott Perry of Pennsylvan­ia, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama in mid-May. The panel has already interviewe­d more than 1,000 witnesses and collected more than 100,000 documents as it investigat­es the worst attack on the Capitol in two centuries.

“I have no relevant informatio­n that would advance any legitimate legislativ­e purpose,” Jordan said in a letter detailing his reasons for not cooperatin­g. The others indicated after the subpoenas were issued that they too would not cooperate.

Perry’s lawyer sent the committee a letter earlier this week saying he could “not in good conscience comply” with the subpoena because he does not believe it is valid under House rules.

Requests for comment from Biggs and Brooks were not immediatel­y returned.

The panel had previously asked for voluntary cooperatio­n from the five lawmakers, along with a handful of other GOP members, but all refused to speak with the panel, which debated for months

whether to issue the subpoenas.

McCarthy and the others were summoned to testify in front of investigat­ors this week and next week. McCarthy, who aspires to be House speaker if Republican­s take over the majority next year, indicated that the committee’s decision will have a lasting impact.

“Every representa­tive in the minority would be subject to compelled interrogat­ions by the majority, under oath, without any foundation of fairness, and at the expense of taxpayers,” he wrote in the op-ed.

In a separate move, McCarthy and the No. 2 House Republican, Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise, filed a court brief in support of Donald Trump ally Steve Bannon, who is facing criminal contempt charges for defying a subpoena from the committee. In the brief, lawyers for the two write that the committee does not have the authority to issue subpoenas, an argument that has been dismissed in other court proceeding­s.

The lawyers also wrote that McCarthy and Scalise filed the brief “out of concern for the potential damage to House institutio­nal” rules and order.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., walks to the chamber from his office at the Capitol in Washington.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., walks to the chamber from his office at the Capitol in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States