Dayton Daily News

Two authors support Issue 1 on racial, treatment grounds

- By Katie Wedell Staff Writer Contact this reporter at 937328-0353 or email Katie. Wedell@coxinc.com.

Two well-known authors are speaking out in favor of Issue 1, the proposed state constituti­onal amendment on the Nov. 6 ballot that would reduce some drug possession crimes from felonies to misdemeano­rs.

“Prisons and also jails are really ill-equipped to solve in any substantiv­e way, problems of drug addiction,” said Piper Kerman, who authored the best-selling book, “Orange is the New Black,” after spending 13 months in a federal prison for a nonviolent drug charge.

Kerman and Michelle Alexander, author of the 2010 book “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarcerat­ion in the Age of Colorblind­ness,” were interviewe­d by the Springfiel­d News-Sun. Both have been advocating on behalf of the proposed amendment.

“We need to learn from our failed drug war . ... A war on drugs that was born with black folks in mind, but it is now threatenin­g the futures of people of all colors,” said Alexander, who argues in the book that mass incarcerat­ion is “a stunningly comprehens­ive and well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow.”

Issue 1 opponents say the proposed amendment does not directly address race.

“The Vote No committee, members of which are widely diverse, is concerned solely with the content of the issue, which would be bad law if passed,” said Chan Cochran, spokesman for the committee. “It removes discretion of judges to enforce addiction treatment, it releases all kinds of felony prisoners from prison early with just a few exceptions, it locks experiment­al law in the constituti­on where it is difficult to change, and according to the state Office of Budget and Management, it will not produce the promised savings or treatment.”

Business leaders are concerned that Issue 1 de facto sanctions drug use and will make it harder for employers to find workers who can pass a drug test, something they already struggle with, Cochran added.

Alexander argues that Issue 1 would benefit Ohio’s economy because fewer people would have felony conviction­s that would prevent them from working many jobs, and more people would be treated for drug addiction that often prevents them from being productive members of society.

Kerman moved to Ohio four years ago and teaches writing classes at two prisons. The status quo of locking up drug users has done nothing to solve the state’s drug addiction crisis, she said.

“We have really punitive drug laws and Ohio struggles with one of the highest drug overdose rates in the country,” she said.

Money saved by incarcerat­ing fewer individual­s could go into the programs that are seeing results, Kerman said, like drug courts, which have been successful in many cities but are lacking in rural areas of Ohio.

“Whenever possible, keeping someone in the community, getting them the help they need, gets much better results than sending them into state prison,” she said. “That’s the policy change that Issue 1 puts into place.”

Alexander and Kerman both pointed to other states — including Utah, Alaska and Oklahoma — which have lowered penalties for nonviolent drug possession offenses and seen positive results.

Oklahoma — which for years had one of the highest incarcerat­ion rates in the country, especially for women — has seen a 29 percent decrease in felony cases since passing a measure similar to Issue 1 in 2016, according to The Oklahoma Policy Institute. There has been a slight drop in the overall crime rate over the same time period, the institute says.

Opponents argue that Issue 1 would not result in any appreciabl­e savings at the state level and would be more costly at the local level. The Springfiel­d News-Sun reported earlier this week that all 11 Montgomery County Common Pleas Court judges are opposed to Issue 1.

One of their arguments is that Issue 1 would eliminate a court punishment that is often used to get people into treatment.

On Thursday, the Ohio Conference NAACP announced its endorsemen­t of Issue 1 because the civil rights organizati­on believes it will addresses racial disparitie­s in Ohio’s justice system.

“A Yes vote on Issue 1 is a big step forward for Ohioans of color who have faced racial disparitie­s at every stage of Ohio’s criminal justice system. There has been a culture of criminaliz­ation in Ohio and across the country that disproport­ionately harms African-Americans and people of color,” said Tom Roberts, president of the Ohio Conference NAACP.

 ??  ?? Prominent authors Piper Kerman (left) and Michelle Alexander back passage of state Issue 1.
Prominent authors Piper Kerman (left) and Michelle Alexander back passage of state Issue 1.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States