Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

UN votes 143-9 to allow Palestinia­n membership

- EDITH M. LEDERER

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. General Assembly voted by a wide margin Friday to grant new “rights and privileges” to a Palestinia­n state and called on the Security Council to reconsider Palestine’s request to become the 194th member of the United Nations.

The world body approved the Arab- and Palestinia­n-sponsored resolution by a vote of 143-9 with 25 abstention­s. The United States voted against it, along with Israel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Papua New Guinea.

The vote reflected the wide global support for full membership of Palestine in the United Nations, with many countries expressing outrage at the escalating death toll in Gaza and fears of a major Israeli offensive in Rafah, a southern city where about 1.3 million Palestinia­ns have sought refuge.

It also demonstrat­ed growing support for the Palestinia­ns. A General Assembly resolution on Oct. 27 calling for a humanitari­an cease-fire in Gaza was approved 12014 with 45 abstention­s. That was just weeks after Israel launched its military offensive in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack in southern Israel, which killed 1,200 people.

While Friday’s resolution gives Palestine some new rights and privileges, it reaffirms that it remains a non-member observer state without full U.N. membership and the right to vote in the General Assembly or at any of its conference­s. And the United States has made clear that it will block Palestinia­n membership and statehood until direct negotiatio­ns with Israel resolve key issues, including security, boundaries and the future of Jerusalem and lead to a two-state solution.

U.S. deputy ambassador Robert Wood said Friday that for the U.S. to support Palestinia­n statehood, direct negotiatio­ns must guarantee Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state and that Palestinia­ns can live in peace in a state of their own.

The U.S. also vetoed a widely backed council resolution April 18 that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for Palestine.

Under the U.N. Charter, prospectiv­e members of the United Nations must be “peace-loving” and the Security Council must recommend their admission to the General Assembly for final approval. Palestine became a U.N. non-member observer state in 2012.

The United States considers Friday’s resolution an attempt to get around the charter’s provisions, Wood reiterated Thursday.

Unlike resolution­s in the Security Council, there are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly. Friday’s resolution required a twothirds majority of members voting and got significan­tly more than the 118-vote minimum.

U.S. allies supported the resolution, including France, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Australia, Estonia and Norway. But European countries were very divided.

The resolution “determines” that a state of Palestine is qualified for membership — dropping the original language that in the General Assembly’s judgment it is “a peace-loving state.” It therefore recommends that the Security Council reconsider its request “favorably.”

CENTER STAGE

The renewed push for full Palestinia­n membership in the U.N. comes as the war in Gaza has put the more than 75-year-old Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict at center stage. At numerous council and assembly meetings, the humanitari­an crisis facing the Palestinia­ns in Gaza and the killing of more than 34,000 people in the territory, according to Gaza health officials, have generated outrage from many countries.

Before the vote, Riyad Mansour, the Palestinia­n U.N. ambassador, told the assembly in an emotional speech that “no words can capture what such loss and trauma signifies for Palestinia­ns, their families, communitie­s and for our nation as a whole.”

He said Palestinia­ns in Gaza “have been pushed to the very edge of the strip, to the very brink of life” with Israel besieging Rafah.

Mansour accused Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of preparing “to kill thousands to ensure his political survival” and aiming to destroy the Palestinia­n people.

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Gilad Erdan vehemently opposed the resolution, accusing U.N. member nations of not mentioning Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack and seeking “to reward modern-day Nazis with rights and privileges.”

He said if an election were held today, Hamas would win, and warned U.N. members that they were “about to grant privileges and rights to the future terror state of Hamas.” He held up a photo of Yehya Sinwar, the mastermind of the Hamas attack on Israel, saying a terrorist “whose stated goal is Jewish genocide” would be a future Palestinia­n leader.

Erdan also accused the assembly of trampling on the U.N. Charter, putting two pages that said “U.N. Charter” in a small shredder he held up.

SETTING PRECEDENT

The original draft of the resolution was changed significan­tly to address concerns not only by the U.S. but also by Russia and China, three Western diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity because negotiatio­ns were private.

The first draft would have conferred on Palestine “the rights and privileges necessary to ensure its full and effective participat­ion” in the assembly’s sessions and U.N. conference­s “on equal footing with member states.” It also made no reference to whether Palestine could vote in the General Assembly.

According to the diplomats, Russia and China, which are strong supporters of Palestine’s U.N. membership, were concerned that granting the rights and privileges listed in an annex could set a precedent for other would-be U.N. members — with Russia concerned about Kosovo and China about Taiwan.

Under longstandi­ng legislatio­n by the U.S. Congress, the United States is required to cut off funding to U.N. agencies that give full membership to a Palestinia­n state, which could mean a cutoff in dues and voluntary contributi­ons to the U.N. from its largest contributo­r.

The final draft that was voted on dropped the language that would put Palestine “on equal footing with member states.” And to address Chinese and Russian concerns, it decided “on an exceptiona­l basis and without setting a precedent” to adopt the rights and privileges in the annex.

It also added a provision in the annex clarifying that it does not give Palestine the right to vote in the General Assembly or put forward candidates for U.N. agencies.

What the resolution does give Palestine are the rights to speak on all issues, not just those related to the Palestinia­ns and the Middle East; to propose agenda items and reply in debates; and to serve on the assembly’s main committees. It also allows Palestinia­ns to participat­e in U.N. and internatio­nal conference­s convened by the United Nations, but without the right to vote.

Palestinia­n President Mahmoud Abbas first delivered the Palestinia­n Authority’s applicatio­n for U.N. membership in 2011. It failed because the Palestinia­ns didn’t get the required minimum support of nine of the Security Council’s 15 members.

They went to the General Assembly and succeeded by more than a two-thirds majority in having their status raised from a U.N. observer to a non-member observer state. That opened the door for the Palestinia­n territorie­s to join the U.N. and other internatio­nal organizati­ons, including the Internatio­nal Criminal Court.

In the Security Council vote on April 18, the Palestinia­ns got much more support for full U.N. membership. The vote was 12 in favor, with the United Kingdom and Switzerlan­d abstaining and the United States voting no and vetoing the resolution.

 ?? (AP/Mahmoud Illean) ?? Victor Macklenin, head of procuremen­t and logistics for UNWRA, the U.N. agency helping Palestinia­n refugees, surveys damage to the agency’s grounds the day after protesters set it on fire in east Jerusalem on Friday. More photos at arkansason­line.com/gazaweek31/.
(AP/Mahmoud Illean) Victor Macklenin, head of procuremen­t and logistics for UNWRA, the U.N. agency helping Palestinia­n refugees, surveys damage to the agency’s grounds the day after protesters set it on fire in east Jerusalem on Friday. More photos at arkansason­line.com/gazaweek31/.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States