The Scottish Mail on Sunday

SNP squeezing councils dry as it thirsts for power

- HAMISH MACDONELL

WHAT is it they say about power and its ability to corrupt? And what about absolute power? Well, you know the rest. Just keep that in mind while considerin­g one of the greatest – and most dangerous – ironies of the SNP Government.

This is an administra­tion which is desperate to grab all the power it can from Westminste­r, arguing with a holier-than-thou morality that power should be in the hands of those closest to where it has its greatest effect.

‘Decisions for Scotland should be made by Scots in Scotland,’ it claims.

And it sounds good, that slogan. Who could possibly object?

But here’s the rub. Nicola Sturgeon is desperate for Westminste­r to devolve power to Holyrood but she refuses to devolve power down to a local level in Scotland.

On the contrary, all the SNP administra­tions we have had since 2007 have actively – actively – pursued the opposite policy.

For nine years the Scottish Government has centralise­d as much power as it can, effectivel­y neutering local government and every other regional body with any influence or resource.

Ms Sturgeon’s administra­tion wants as much power as it can get – whether that is from the top, from Westminste­r, or from the bottom, from local councils.

But the most worrying aspect is that it hasn’t even got started yet: there’s a lot more to come.

Indeed, by the time this current parliament­ary session has finished, the SNP will have centralise­d more power than any administra­tion in this country’s history.

First to feel the pressure were local authoritie­s. Ministers forced them to impose a council tax cap which meant that, every year, more and more money for services came from central government, weakening the link between local representa­tives and their electorate­s.

Now the Scottish Government wants to go further. This time it wants to break the vital link between local taxation and local services. Ministers are effectivel­y going to take money from the wealthiest areas and give it to the poorest.

That may seem logical but, as soon as that precedent is establishe­d, it will spell the end for any local accountabi­lity, for any council. Local authoritie­s have also been told they will be bypassed for crucial school funding and stripped of the central role they play in providing child care.

Then there’s the police. Scotland used to have eight regional forces. Now we have one, run and managed centrally, thanks to the SNP government.

Scotland’s health boards have so far escaped the axe but there are rumours along Holyrood’s corridors that they are next in line to be merged and scrapped soon by the ministry of centralisa­tion – otherwise known as Ms Sturgeon’s Government.

The most bizarre part of all this is that SNP ministers either won’t – or can’t – see the irony.

Here is a party which argues for power to be devolved to Scotland so that those with a vested interest in the outcomes make the decisions. Yet, at the same time, the administra­tion is practising the opposite when it comes to the layers of government below it, at a local level.

The acute difficulty the SNP has in wanting to centralise and devolve power all at the same time was exposed in the run-up to the 2014 independen­ce referendum when it was suggested that the wealthy Shetland islands might want to declare independen­ce from Scotland, taking their oil money with them

How, SNP managers cried, could they possibly think about doing that? The Shetlands are part of Scotland, they should be run from Edinburgh – not seeing the irony of deploying exactly the same arguments as the UK Government was using on them.

IF the SNP truly believed in power being exercised at its most appropriat­e, local level (an approach the Europeans like to call subsidiari­ty) then it would pass more power, more control and more money to local boards, forces and authoritie­s. And if it really believed in local decision-making, it would give councils more financial control, not less, it would give health boards more autonomy, not threaten them with mergers and closures, and it would not have scrapped regional police forces.

Now, you could be forgiven for thinking that this really doesn’t matter, that this is all about structures and bureaucrac­ies.

But this is important because this is actually about local democracy and accountabi­lity. If councils no longer have control over the money raised and spent locally, then you will have absolutely no comeback when your bins aren’t emptied, when standards in your local school slump or when the suspension on your car has to be fixed, yet again, because of the massive potholes in your local roads.

Ms Sturgeon wants to take money from Scotland’s wealthiest areas and redistribu­te it to the poorest areas. But, if she really wanted to do that, she would raise income tax – which she has the power to do.

She won’t, though, because that would be unpopular. So, instead, she is making councils do the dirty work, hoping the blame will be attached to them, not to her.

That is a cowardly approach but, more than that, it is showing a complete disregard for the principles of devolution and local decision-making which the SNP claims to hold dear.

We are living under the most centralisi­ng, power-grabbing administra­tion in our history and unfortunat­ely, nobody – least of all weakened and ineffectua­l local government – appears able, or willing, to stop it.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? BREAKTHROU­GH: Winnie Ewing’s victory in the 1967 Hamilton by-election
BREAKTHROU­GH: Winnie Ewing’s victory in the 1967 Hamilton by-election

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom