The Scotsman

Scottish Power’s commitment to ‘cheaper green energy’ a sure path to disaster

-

I write in support of the points made by Alan Thomson (Letters, 22 October) about the fallacious claims made by Scottish Power in their commitment to “cheaper green energy”.

The UK, and Scotland in particular, is sleepwalki­ng to social and economic disaster by the headlong and misguided rush to remove all sources of carbon generation from our society.

Ed Miliband’s 2008 Climate Change Act put into law the foundation­s of the damage and from there the SNP have worked hard to outdo the rest of the UK on the road to folly.

Eliminatin­g our entire carbon output would have a minuscule effect, almost zero, on the world’s total. This is all in pursuit of principles set by anthropoge­nic climate changescie­ncewhichar­econtentio­us to many but are not allowed to be disputed, even by renowned climatolog­ists.

If you think this is farfetched, try finding a reasonable, indeed any, counter argument on any of the BBC’S output. Climate changes on a continual basis but the manmade claim is far from proven.

Subsidies come from the UK as a whole: an independen­t Scotland would have to find the money on its own. This would be completely unaffordab­le,causingexp­onentially increased and utterly drastic levels of fuel poverty.

Also, as our last two nuclear powered generating stations are nearing the end of their lives, Scotland will then be completely dependent on elsewhere for our base load electricit­y provision. This is no small considerat­ion: wind generation will not happen when we require it most, in winter anticyclon­ic conditions, when solar generation is also severely curtailed due to our short winter daylight.

Do not be fooled, the campaign to have smart meters installed in every house is not to do us any favours, it is about being able to give consumers the choice between accepting spot (ie higher) prices or being switched off at peak times when electricit­y generation is limited.

The SNP say there will be no sales of direct carbon-emitting cars by 2032. Ignoring the very major limitation­s of current electric cars but allowing that these will improve, the infrastruc­ture is almost entirely lacking and there are no realistic plans to put it in place.

We are told home-charging of vehicles will be the way ahead. How will you charge your vehicle if you live in a block of flats or a crowded terraced street? Does anyone have any idea of the cost and disruption of providing a workable infrastruc­ture for charging electric powered vehicles? The cost will be massive, running to many billions and can only be met through significan­tly increased taxation and/or huge cuts elsewhere.

Scotland’s and the UK’S energy policy is a complete shambles. However, we can all rest assured that when the lights are out, your car won’t work and offices are on short time, all of the people responsibl­e will have disappeare­d like snowflakes in the sun, enjoying their generous pensions and saying “it wisnae me”. DAVID K ALLAN Hopper Gardens, Newcraigha­ll, Edinburgh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom