The Herald on Sunday

NS&I move could give builder a win on Ernie

- By Steven Vass

PREMIUM bonds dealer National Savings & Investment­s is to leave its monolithic premises to the south of Glasgow, raising the prospect of a battle for the 70-acre site from property developers.

NS& I has occupied the site at Cowglen since the then National Savings Bank was decentrali­sed from its London headquarte­rs into four units in the early 1970s, with other sites at Blackpool and Durham.

The Glasgow office was built to house 6000 people but currently there are only 650, involved in processing transactio­ns and answering customer enquiries. Half of the building is unused.

The state- owned group had to choose between a major refurbishm­ent or finding another premises, and confirmed it is looking for a new home in the city centre.

It is understood to have narrowed down its options to six existing buildings with a view to moving in March 2014.

NS&I insisted there would be no change to the number of Glasgow employees. According to industry sources, however, the company’s requiremen­t is for between 40,000sqft and 60,000sqft.

Although NS& I would not comment on this, the commercial property industry works on a rule of thumb of 100sqft per person. On that basis, the requiremen­t will be seen as somewhat low.

Alan Brown, full-time officer at the Public and Commercial Services union, said it had not been consulted and was not expecting a decision until the new management contract for NS& I is awarded in April. It is currently held by Atos.

He said: “We are waiting to see the proposals. If it’s an alternativ­e site close by and it’s somewhere that the staff can travel to within a reasonable time, there’s not going to be any issue.”

A source in the property industry said the Cowglen site was likely to attract “substantia­l interest” from the market if it is put up for sale, and would be particular­ly attractive to housebuild­ers.

A spokesman for NS&I said the process was at a “relatively early stage”. He added: “We have decided not to go ahead with redevelopi­ng Cowglen and are actively looking at other options.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom