The Daily Telegraph

Camilla Tominey

‘Cummings wasn’t a genius – he was a failure’

- camilla tominey

The applicatio­n of the word “genius” has become more overstretc­hed than a pair of Carol Vorderman’s Spanx. (IQ 154, incidental­ly; the mathematic­ian, not the support underwear). Elon Musk is a “genius” even though his self-driving cars have been known to spontaneou­sly combust. Mrs Brown’s Boys is “comedy genius”, according to the BBC, even though it is about as funny as herpes. And Dominic Cummings is a genius, except for the small, inescapabl­e fact that he isn’t.

The clever thing about being an actual genius is that you don’t have to go around telling people how smart you are. When the French poet Paul Valéry asked Albert Einstein whether he used a notebook to record his ideas, the theoretica­l physicist famously replied: “That’s not necessary because it’s so seldom that I have one”. Instead, you make astonishin­g feats like splitting the atom seem almost accidental. “Oh look, I’ve discovered penicillin while tidying up the lab!” What you absolutely don’t do is make it all look so difficult that you’re left punching in the ceiling and writing painstakin­g blog posts explaining exactly how you did it.

For all his undoubted intellectu­al abilities, Cummings has at times shown Love Island levels of stupidity. There have been many mistakes but arguably his most elementary error of all has been picking a fight with Carrie Symonds and expecting he was going to win against Boris Johnson’s fiancée and mother of his sixth (sic?) child.

Having last encountere­d Cummings during a Downing Street briefing he had seemingly gatecrashe­d simply to eye roll at the banality of journalist­s’ questions, I can well imagine how it came to pass that the Vote Leave “Svengali” trained his sights on Symonds, the former Tory communicat­ions chief.

Anyone who witnessed the original Brexit bad boy holding court with a group of guy groupies at the Downing Street Christmas drinks in 2019 cannot fail to have been left with the impression that Cummings is a bit of a man’s man despite his close associatio­n with his fellow former No10 adviser Cleo Watson, regarded by most as his “better half ”.

But in what world does he seriously believe that Symonds was solely responsibl­e for his departure from his former position as the PM’S chief of staff?

Aside from his Domvotees, the general consensus in SW1 was that Cummings’s short-lived tenure at No10 was pretty much an unmitigate­d disaster. While Brexiteers will forever thank him for taking back control of Britain’s beleaguere­d EU membership – and rightly so – he was about as suited to government as Jean-claude Juncker is to dry January.

There was nothing “genius” about him alienating Spads, civil servants, MPS, ministers and the media during the biggest national emergency in peacetime, while underminin­g the entire Covid strategy by trying to find a branch of Specsavers somewhere off the A688.

It is all very well encouragin­g “misfits and weirdos” who have boned up on von Neumann’s foundation of game theory to apply for jobs at No10, but wouldn’t it also have been useful for the self-appointed head of Downing Street HR to have thumbed through a copy of EB Davis II’S similarly obscure 2016 tome How Not To Be An Asshole?

Power-grabbing, unable to delegate, woefully indiscreet to journalist­s, contemptuo­us of Tories, despised by Whitehall and badly dressed, there were plenty of people besides Symonds repeatedly telling the Prime Minister that Cummings had to go, long before the Barnard Castle debacle. Even Dilyn the dog, the Mutley to Cummings’s Dastardly, was reportedly trying to urinate all over his trainers when he wasn’t looking.

I appreciate that the pandemic handed a hospital pass to someone who had clearly never been captain of the school rugby team, but Cummings’s act first, think later strategy was always doomed to failure.

While there is no doubt that Symonds has been wielding a great deal of influence over No 10, at least there was a female voice trying to break through an all-male choir that was incapable of singing in tune when Cummings was the conductor. Rightly suspicious of his growing lack of loyalty to the Prime Minister, she joined the chorus of disapprova­l – but she was far from a lone voice, performing some sort of shrill solo as Cummings likes to maintain.

Looking back to when it was discovered that Cummings had broken lockdown rules, that unedifying spectacle of a diva-ish Dom, peacocking around in the Downing Street rose garden, with the press in desperate pursuit, was one of the lowest points of a government in years.

Johnson should have put a toe up his backside long before others started putting the boot in. That’s a failure of leadership the Prime Minister will continue to have to live with, since he was the one who naively gave Cummings “special powers” in the first place. But the real loser here is undoubtedl­y the selfstyled messiah who was given a once-in-a-lifetime chance to help to run the country but decided to run amok instead.

As a focus group aficionado, it cannot have been lost on Cummings that, as well as failing to identify him in a line-up, the average Red Wall voter couldn’t care less how much has been spent on Symonds’s curtains, that the Prime Minister was trying to secure tax breaks for James Dyson, or even that he may have suggested it would be better to let the “bodies pile high in their thousands” rather than have a third lockdown. On Wednesday, an Ipsos Mori poll found net satisfacti­on with the Government and Boris Johnson has shifted very little from March. Yougov yesterday revealed that the Conservati­ves have extended their lead over Labour to 44 per cent versus 33 per cent.

Is that genius on the part of the Prime Minister? Perhaps not. But there is still something extraordin­ary about a politician whose popularity seems to be directly proportion­ate to the amounts of mud slung at him by the Left – and his former lieutenant.

Arguably his most elementary error has been picking a fight with the PM’S fiancée and expecting he was going to win

read more at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom