The Daily Telegraph

Prosecutor quits over Barr’s vote fraud note

- By Ben Riley-smith US EDITOR

THE US justice official who oversees voter fraud investigat­ions has resigned after US attorney general William Barr said prosecutor­s could look into allegation­s of election irregulari­ties.

Richard Pilger, a career prosecutor in the j ustice department’s public i ntegrity section, sent an email – obtained by US media outlets – which announced his resignatio­n just hours after Mr Barr’s memo was issued.

The Barr memo said that federal prosecutor­s were allowed to look into “substantia­l allegation­s” of voter fraud before the 2020 election results are formally certified by states.

Mr Barr’s direction clashes with longstandi­ng justice department policies warning against launching criminal investigat­ions into voter fraud while votes are being counted, reflecting concerns that could undercut public trust in the results.

The investigat­ion led to an immediate and heated backlash from the legal community, which has frequently accused Mr Barr of acting politicall­y to support Donald Trump.

The attorney general has always vehemently denied that.

Mr Barr’s interventi­on comes as the US president continues to claim, without evidence, that there was a widespread move to “steal” the election from him. The Trump campaign has submitted a blizzard of lawsuits in key battlegrou­nd states. One in Michigan was rejected by a judge this week.

A copy of Mr Barr’s memo was obtained by The New York Times. It was carefully worded and ran across two pages. In parts, Mr Barr argued that there could be specific instances where it would be justifiabl­e for prosecutor­s to investigat­e voter fraud before votes were certified.

Mr Barr began his memo by saying while “most allegation­s” are so minor that they would not impact the election result, and so can be investigat­ed at a later date, that is not true of all cases.

He continued: “Furthermor­e, any concerns that overt actions taken by t he [ j usti c e] department c ould inadverten­tly impact an election are greatly minimised, if they exist at all, once voting has concluded, even if election certificat­ion has not yet been completed.

“Given this and given that voting in our current elections has now concluded, I authorise you to pursue substantia­l allegation­s of voting and vote tabulation irregulari­ties prior to the certificat­ion of elections in your jurisdicti­ons in certain cases, as I have

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom