The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)
Bid to close legal loophole on fines
PARKING: Government may introduce ‘keeper liability’
Private parking “fines” in Scotland are to be made fully enforceable when a loophole in the law is closed.
The Scottish Government is considering introducing “keeper liability”, which would allow firms to pursue vehicle owners for cash if they cannot identify a defaulting driver.
Keeper liability has been used in England but Scottish motorists have been able to use the loophole to avoid paying tickets.
Refusal to name the driver of a vehicle attracting a parking charge can see the matter dropped.
The move has been welcomed by politicians, who say it makes the law on the subject clearer.
The news comes after Sir Greg Knight’s Parking (Code of Practice) Act passed into law on Friday. Covering the whole of the UK, the Act imposes a universal code of practice on private parking firms.
A loophole that has allowed thousands of drivers to avoid private parking “fines” could soon be closed, The Courier can reveal.
Government officials are considering introducing “keeper liability”, which would see vehicle owners pursued for cash if the driver cannot be identified.
Currently, private parking firms can only recover money from the person who parks the vehicle on their land and unlike in England, there is no obligation for the owner to reveal the identity of the driver.
It is understood keeper liability is being considered as part of the Transport (Scotland) Bill, which would also outlaw pavement parking.
The change could open the floodgates for parking firms to pursue unpaid tickets, legal experts have confirmed.
Victoria Stronach, senior solicitor with law firm Miller Hendry, said: “The keeper liability clause in the new Transport (Scotland) Bill would close what many see as a ‘legal loophole’.
“It would mean that the owner (or ‘keeper’) of a vehicle would be required to pay the parking fine themselves if they choose not to identify who was driving.”
Pete Wishart, who has campaigned extensively against heavy-handed tactics used by private parking firms, said keeper liability would end the current confusing legal position.
The Perth and North Perthshire MP said: “Keeper liability has existed in England for some time now and the difference in law in Scotland has caused some confusion about what drivers can and cannot do when it comes to private parking fines.
“Between the possible introduction of keeper liability in Scotland and the UK-wide parking bill, which I helped to progress at Westminster, we could finally be reaching a time when rules about parking are not only fairer, but they are also much clearer.
“This has never been about denying that well-regulated car parking operators have the right to charge for a service that they provide, but the industry realises that certain rogue operators have dragged their reputation down and that they have to change.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We are working with the private parking industry and the UK Government to ensure that Scotland is fully represented in the development of a proposed new code of practice.
“We are also considering the issue of extending keeper liability to private parking and what the most appropriate legislative vehicle would be for its introduction.”
“We could finally be reaching a time when rules about parking are not only fairer, but they are also much clearer.
PETE WISHART