Sunday Mail (UK)

# SCOTLAND THE FREEBIE

Warning after net posts by American bloggers

- Russell Findlay

American social media stars were given Government-funded, allexpense- paid trips to Scotland in exchange for gushing online reviews.

Four online “influencer­s” were given the freebie visits and put up in five-star accommodat­ion across the country.

But the Twitter, Instagram and YouTube posts they published were not marked as advertisin­g, in a likely breach of the US’ strict Federal Trade Commission laws.

Mary Engle, head of the FTC’s advertisin­g practices division, said: “Under FTC law, advertisin­g should be identi f iable as adver t ising , in whatever medium it appears.

“This means a social media post that’s a promotiona­l message rather than an independen­t opinion should be clearly presented as such, for example through a prominent disclosure that it is sponsored advertisin­g.

“We issued guidance for adver tisers and endorsers outlining when, why and how they must disclose their relationsh­ip so that consumers are not misled into thinking that sponsored posts are independen­t.”

The Scottish Government spent about £17,000 on the three trips which were promoted using # MyScotStor­y on their own website www. scotland.org and across social media, which also fails to identify the reviews as advertisin­g.

The trips were taken by Los Angeles- based food blogger Jo Stougaard, “online power couple” Mark Miller and Ethan Hethcote, and lifestyle vlogger Lindsey Hughes.

They stayed in upmarket hotels including the Balmoral in Edinburgh and Glasgow’s Blythswood. And they were treated to exclusive meals and entertainm­ent during the visits, which lasted between five and 10 days.

Hughes was sent to TRNSMT music festival during her summer stay.

The government also paid planning fees of £1232 per trip to Edinburgh- based creative agency Whitespace.

The Advertisin­g Standards Authority say they are powerless to regulate the three social media influencer­s as they are all based in the United States.

But following a Sunday Mail investigat­ion, they have launched a probe into the Scott ish Government’s own online posts, which are subject to UK advertisin­g rules.

Government accounts on YouTube and Twitter promoted the trips but did not state that the write-ups were effectivel­y a form of advertisin­g. An ASA

spokesman said: “The social media posts by influencer­s based abroad, paid for by the Scottish Government, would likely fall outside our remit.

“We don’t have jurisdicti­on over an American citizen’s posts, particular­ly where they are not targeted at UK consumers. But if the Scottish Government were to adopt/incorporat­e the posts into their marketing, then they could potentiall­y become advertisin­g that falls under our rules.

“We would then consider, in terms of content and context of the posts, whether they were obviously identifiab­le as ads.” On Thursday, the ASA launched a project exploring people’s ability to recognise online ads and how they are labelled.

They are seeking evidence to establish how social media users can be duped by celebritie­s not declaring their commercial incentive for plugging products or services. ASA chief executive Guy Parker said :“Social influencer and native advertisin­g might be relatively new but the advertisin­g rules haven’t changed – people shouldn’t have to play the detective to work out if they’re being advertised to.

“That means the status of a tweet, blog, vlog, Instagram post or story should be clear. Our call for evidence will play an important part in helping us understand how consumers recognise and respond to online labelling of ads and how we apply the rules in this area.”

Secretary for Culture and Tourism Fiona Hyslop has been challenged to explain the decision to use taxpayers’ cash.

Labour’s tourism spokeswoma­n Claire Baker MSP said: “It is highly embarrassi­ng the Scottish Government have been caught using backdoor ads, masqueradi­ng as reviews.

“With some of the best and most beautiful scenery and attraction­s around the world, Scotland sells itself. There is no need for a strategy that may leave holidaymak­ers feeling duped.

“The ASA must fully investigat­e these posts and see if the Scottish Government have broken any rules. The Culture and Tourism Secretary must be clear about the extent of her knowledge of these decisions.

“We should be engaging with the millions of real tourists that travel to Scotland every year, not giving expensive freebies to people based on the number of followers they have on social media.”

Tory shadow culture secretary Rachael Hamilton added: “If there are concerns about the rules and regulation­s of advertisin­g standards, the Scottish Government should thoroughly investigat­e these before setting aside more investment.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said they had “no control over the content posted”. He added: “Encouragin­g more people to live, work, study, visit and invest in Scotland is crucial to our economic growth.

“Social media influencer­s have a huge role to play and this partnershi­p between the Scottish Government and three influencer­s was conducted in line with up-to-date guidance at that time.”

Stougaard, Miller, Hethcote and Hughes did not respond to our requests for a comment.

The status of a tweet, blog or post should be clear

 ??  ?? FESTIVAL TRNSMT in Glasgow Pic Victoria Stewart
FESTIVAL TRNSMT in Glasgow Pic Victoria Stewart
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom