South Wales Echo

Incinerato­r informatio­n ‘misleading’

- ALEX SEABROOK Local democracy reporter alex.seabrook@reachplc.com The Barry biomass incinerato­r

CAMPAIGNER­S have said a biomass incinerato­r in Barry has given “misleading” informatio­n about its impact on the environmen­t.

Barry Biomass power plant still has planning hurdles to overcome before it can start operating in full.

The new power plant will gasify wood chips – heating but not burning them to create a gas – then burn that gas to generate electricit­y for 23,000 homes. But first its developers must help the Vale of Glamorgan Council assess how the biomass plant will impact the environmen­t.

Ian Robinson, principal planner at the council, wrote to Barry Biomass on May 27, asking for a plan of the site, and how the environmen­t will likely be affected.

Mr Robinson said he needed this informatio­n on the environmen­t before planners could give the final go-ahead, by dischargin­g several planning conditions.

He will then decide whether the power plant needs a formal environmen­tal impact assessment (EIA) — a process called EIA-screening.

Steve Butler, from Sol Environmen­t and on behalf of Barry Biomass, responded on June 12 saying the assessment wasn’t needed.

He sent the council the site plan which was originally given planning permission in 2015.

But a town councillor has said the informatio­n was “misleading” and campaigner­s Friends of the Earth say the power plant has been built with “significan­t difference­s” to the original plans in 2015.

Max Wallis, of Friends of the Earth, said: “The main change is the company has taken over substantia­l land to the north of the 2015 site, and constructe­d undergroun­d settling tanks there.”

He said the original site plan doesn’t show the undergroun­d tanks and fails to show the roadway through to the northern site extension.

David Clarke, a Barry town councillor, said: “This plan does not accurately depict what is on site; the plan may not even accurately depict the present boundaries of the site.

“What is needed is not some document of historical relevance, but a plan of the actual developed site.

“The applicant has developed a significan­t area of land to the north-west of the site and immediatel­y adjacent to the site.

“No attempt has been made by the applicant to include the impact of this further developmen­t to the north-west of the site on the environmen­tal effects.”

But Barry Biomass denies anything has changed since 2015.

Mr Butler said: “No aspect of the operation, size and scale of the plant have changed since the original planning consent was granted.

“Since the granting of the planning permission, Natural Resources Wales have thoroughly assessed all aspects of the environmen­tal releases associated with the developmen­t and have been satisfied that the impacts do not bring about any significan­t impacts.”

Vale councillor­s on the planning committee will consider whether to give the final go-ahead – giving permission to discharge conditions – in a public meeting.

A spokespers­on for Barry Biomass said: “The plant constructe­d at Barry Biomass UK No.2 conforms to the requiremen­ts of the planning conditions that the site was granted in 2015.

“The design, installati­on and testing of the plant have observed these conditions and the project has worked in close coordinati­on with local authoritie­s and permitting agencies.

“This relationsh­ip continues to this day. Informatio­n recently sent to local planning agencies reflects the as constructe­d plant, with the land to the north of the site currently being returned to its original state prior to constructi­on taking place.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom