Portsmouth News

Criticism of ‘bizarre’ car ban on residents at future care home

Plan to prevent New Forest drives

- By TOBY PAINE The News toby.paine@thenews.co.uk

FUTURE residents at a new care home in Stubbingto­n will be banned from keeping a car - in a bid to prevent them from driving to the New Forest.

The 68-bed home in Stubbingto­n Lane was approved by councillor­s who reluctantl­y imposed the car ban condition set by Natural England.

It comes as Natural England has drawn up a plan to prevent disturbanc­e to the New Forest. This includes recommendi­ng planning conditions on developmen­ts in council areas within a 13km radius of protected sites.

As well as Fareham, the zone includes Eastleigh, New Forest, Southampto­n, Test Valley and Wiltshire council areas.

Speaking at a recent planning meeting, Warsash councillor Michael Ford said the condition was utterly bizarre.

He said: ‘My first thought when I read this was: has this come out of the Soviet Union or the People's Republic of China?

'You will have no children - you will have no cars,’ he said.

He said he fears the same condi- tion could be applied in further planning applicatio­ns yet to come.

It comes after ecoloareas gists were commission­ed to research that negatively impact certain site s in the New Forest previously given special protection by the European Union.

The Zone of Influence report, by Footprint Ecology, draws up a 13.8km radius catchment area in which it's thought new developmen­ts could have an adverse effect.

F o otprint E c ology r ecommended e xcluding Fareham in the 13.8km implementa­tion area - due to the Solent acting as a barrier - but Natural England included the borough anyway. A spokespers­on from Natural England said: ‘Most visitors to New Forest designated sites originate from within a 13.8km radius of the protected site boundaries.

‘It is Natural England’s advice that new residentia­l developmen­t within this zone is likely to have a significan­t effect on the sites via recreation­al impacts, alone or in combinatio­n with other plans or projects, without suitable mitigation.

‘Most of the borough of Fareham lies within the 13.8km buffer zone and telephone survey data indicates that frequency of visits is similar to those in the neighbouri­ng borough of Eastleigh.’

Next week Fareham Borough Council will consider an interim mitigation solution.

This will include ‘alternativ­e recreation­al opportunit­ies’ such as parks and open spaces to deflect visits away from the New Forest.

If the solution is not approved, Natural England has the power to thwart planning applicatio­ns that could have adverse effects on the New Forest.

There are concerns this could create a backlog of planning permission­s that could make the council fall short on its housing targets set by the government.

Cllr Simon Martin, executive member for planning, said Natural England used 117 telephone surveys to determine that Fareham residents make 15 visits to the New Forest each year.

‘I don’t think that’s particular­ly significan­t,’ he said.

‘Natural England at the moment are putting objections in and saying things shouldn’t happen until this issue of the New Forest disturbanc­e has been sorted out.

‘We could be in a position where other park areas like the South Downs come up with something similar - there has to be a commonsens­e solution.

‘I do detect from having spoken with various people in government that this is a more contentiou­s issue and effectivel­y it’s an unfair way of making sure that areas in the New Forest are properly looked after.’

Suella Braverman, MP for Fareham, also shares concerns about the scheme - and the cost for developers of any mitigation measures.

‘I was recently made aware of reports that under the mitigation plans, developers in Fareham will now have a premium of £156 per planning applicatio­n,' she said,

‘I have now been informed that in practice this has gone up to £247 per unit, in one case.

‘This is unacceptab­le, considerin­g that the New Forest ‘Zone of Influence Report’ excluded Fareham from the 13.8km implementa­tion area, which has now been reversed and the 13.8km zone has been applied to Fareham.

‘I am now seeking urgent discussion­s with Natural England to interrogat­e these measures and to closer examine their modelling, which I believe is misinforme­d and unrepresen­tative.’

Councillor­s approved the demolition of buildings at Hammond Industrial Estate to make way for the new care home in Fareham.

The applicatio­n was brought by Frontier Estates Ltd.

My first thought was: has this come out of the Soviet Union or China?

Councillor Michael Ford

 ?? ??
 ?? Aerial picture: Shaun Roster ?? PREVENTING DISTURBANC­E An aerial view of part of the borough of Fareham and, below, Councillor Michael Ford who has criticised the utterly bizarre condition for approval of the care home in Stubbingto­n
Aerial picture: Shaun Roster PREVENTING DISTURBANC­E An aerial view of part of the borough of Fareham and, below, Councillor Michael Ford who has criticised the utterly bizarre condition for approval of the care home in Stubbingto­n

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom