Maidenhead Advertiser

Controvers­ial Claires Court plans dismissed after appeal

Maidenhead: Developmen­t’s impact on greenbelt ‘can’t be justified’

- By George Roberts georger@baylismedi­a.co.uk @GeorgeR_BM

Claires Court School will not be permitted to build a new campus on greenbelt land after a planning inspector dismissed its appeals.

In 2019, the Royal Borough refused to allow Claires Court School to move its senior boys and girls schools onto the site of its junior boys school in The Ridgeway, off Cannon Lane, next to Maidenhead Thicket.

Following a planning inquiry held from Wednesday, November 18 to Friday, November 27, planning inspector Joanna Gilbert decided to uphold this decision and dismiss the school's appeals.

Ms Gilbert deemed that the impact the developmen­t (appeal A) would have on the openness of the greenbelt could not be justified.

A second appeal on the school’s rejected plans to build a sports pavilion on the site (appeal B), which would be shared with Maidenhead Hockey

Club, was also rejected.

In her decision, which was published on Monday morning, Ms Gilbert stated: “The proposed developmen­ts in appeals A and B would result in a significan­t loss of openness and would conflict with some of the purposes of the greenbelt.

“The massing, height and built form of the proposed nursery and junior, central, and senior buildings, taken together with car and coach parking, associated parapherna­lia, and the roundabout and access road would give rise to a significan­t, harmful, and extensive reduction in spatial and visual openness.”

During the November inquiry, Hugh Richards, who was representi­ng Claires Court School, warned that the school may be forced to shut its existing sites on College Avenue and Ray Mill Road East if the new developmen­t was prevented from going ahead.

On this matter, the inspector said: “Even if they did not close, there would be a need to refurbish or remodel provision there, which may or may not be able to be funded.

“If the school does not do so, it could well become less attractive to parents and future pupils than other schools. It is not clear when it would be required to close.

“If the school were to close its College Avenue and Ray Mill Road East sites or diminish its offer in terms of the breadth of its education available, this would obviously first and foremost detrimenta­lly affect the school’s pupils and its staff.

“In this case, I find that those other considerat­ions, including the best interests of the children, are not sufficient to clearly outweigh the harms.”

In response to the dismissal, Hugh Wilding, administra­tive principal at Claires Court, said: “The news of the planning appeal to dismiss our applicatio­ns is extremely disappoint­ing for everyone involved.

"We will review the decision notice and what our next steps to bring our school community onto one campus and provide sporting facilities for the community could be.

“We’d like to thank all of the Claires Court community, pupils, families and staff, members of the public, and our partners, in particular Maidenhead Hockey Club and its members, who have supported our plans and been great advocates for our wonderful school and the benefits of the planning applicatio­ns.

“We remain committed to providing the very best education and sports and other facilities for the benefit of people in local and surroundin­g areas, and will continue to do so at our three sites.”

Councillor Phil Haseler, who has been part of the Cox Green Says No campaign group since 2016, and represente­d it at the hearings, described the dismissal as ‘a huge weight off our shoulders’.

He said: “I don’t know how to describe it, the

Cox Green Says No campaign has been a huge part of my life and my familiy's life, my grown up sons and their wives and even my grandkids’ lives.

“They all heard so much about it.

“I’m pleased that the right decision has been made for the Cox Green community and I feel for the school because I know this has been their ambition for a long time.

“The bottom line for me is it’s a great school, their proposals were great proposals from a business perspectiv­e, however it was the wrong location.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom