Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review
AI-generated images of Met Gala fool Internet users
Katy Perry and Rihanna didn’t attend the Met Gala this year. But that didn’t stop AI-generated images from tricking some fans into thinking the stars made appearances on the steps of fashion’s biggest night.
Deepfake images depicting a handful of big names at the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s annual fundraiser quickly spread online on May 7 and 8.
Some eagle-eyed social media users spotted discrepancies and platforms themselves, such as X’s Community Notes, soon noted that the images were likely created using artificial intelligence. One clue that a viral picture of Perry in a flower-covered gown, for example, was bogus is that the carpeting on the stairs matched that from the 2018 event, not this year’s green-tinged fabric lined with live foliage.
Still, others were fooled, including Perry’s own mother. Hours after at least two AI-generated images of the singer began swirling online, Perry reposted them to her Instagram, accompanied by a screenshot of a text that appeared to be from her mom complimenting her on what she thought was a real Met Gala appearance.
“lol mom the AI got to you too, BEWARE!” Perry responded in the exchange.
In a caption on her Instagram post, Perry wrote, “couldn’t make it to the MET, had to work.” The post also included a muted video of her singing.
Meanwhile, a fake image of Rihanna in a stunning white gown embroidered with flowers, birds and branches also made its rounds online.
While the source or sources of these images is hard to lock down, the realistic-looking Met Gala backdrop seen in many suggests that whatever AI tool was used to create them was likely trained on some images of past events.
Last year, Getty sued a leading AI image generator, Londonbased Stability AI, alleging that it had copied more than 12 million photographs from Getty’s stock photography collection without permission.
Getty has since launched its own AI image-generator trained on its works, but blocks attempts to generate what it describes as “problematic content.”
Experts note that each instance underlines growing concerns around the misuse of this technology, particularly regarding disinformation and the potential to carry out scams, identity theft or propaganda and even election manipulation.