Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Mishandlin­g by Govt. puts

Thursday's Pepiliyana attack on Muslim business house outrages Hakeem, SLMC holds emergency meeting to review ties with UPFA CJ 43 Shirani B chief guest at BASL convocatio­n; CJ 44 not invited; lawyers send strong message Govt. mending ties with India post

- By Our Political Editor

The National New Year is only two weeks away. For most Sri Lankans, the countdown for the season has already begun. Small time business outlets and larger outfits are recording a gradual increase in customers though shopping fever is still to reach peak levels

Yet, for the UPFA Government, it is no holiday. Troublesho­oting on many fronts remains high priority.This is notwithsta­nding the outcome of the second US-backed resolution adopted at the UN Human Rights Council sessions in Geneva just nine days ago. That drew considerab­le attention not only of the Government but also of most Sri Lankans. The reverberat­ions it caused continue to echo in the different capitals of the world, including Colombo.

On Friday, Justice Minister Rauff Hakeem telephoned President Mahinda Rajapaksa to urge him to summon an emergency meeting of the Cabinet. The cause for this request was the attack on the head office and storehouse of an apparel outlet chain. It is owned by a Muslim. Rajapaksa said it was not an attack that was directed per se at Muslims but one triggered by events following a personal relationsh­ip between a Muslim youth and a Sinhala girl. It had centred on claims by the girl that she was raped. Later, Police inquiries revealed that this incident had no connection to the attack. Sources at 'Temple Trees' said a heated argument ensued between the President and Hakeem. Hakeem was complainin­g he had lost face with the Muslim community.

A.R.A. Hafeez, Media Consultant to Minister Hakeem and his own brother, issued a strongly worded statement. Some of the references in it were also repeated by the Muslim Congress leader when he addressed a meeting at Katugastot­a on Friday afternoon. This is what it said:

"The Leader of Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) and Minister of Justice, Rauff Hakeem, has requested His Excellency the President Mahinda Rajapaksa to convene a cabinet meeting to discuss the rising religious unrest and civil disturbanc­e in the country.

"Minister Hakeem has also contacted all the Muslim parliament­arians including Senior Minister A. H. M.Fowzie (who is currently out of the country) and Hon Ministers Rishard Bathiuthee­n and A. L. M.Athaullah for the meeting, with this regard.

"The Minister wishes to take this opportunit­y to record his patent displeasur­e and condemnati­on on the attack on a private business site, last evening. He believes that this was seemingly carried out as a sequel to the on-going attacks on the religious places and hate campaigns against Muslims and other religious minority communitie­s in the country. As such, Minister Hakeem says he is constraine­d not to treat this as an isolated incident. He is equally dismayed at the ineffectiv­e response of the law and order machinery in containing the spread of such violence and unrest that fuels insecurity and peace of all minority communitie­s in Sri Lanka.

"He says that we believe that the 30-year civil unrest, violence and bloodshed confined to the war front of the North and East is over. What we are now witnessing is unrest and violence extended to the rest of the country too, threatenin­g post-war religious freedom with the potential to lead our multi-ethno-religious communitie­s to irreversib­le depths of antagonism once again. The President and his powerful good office that contained violence and bloodshed of the past, he believes can and will waste no time in curbing such violence too, by nipping it in the bud.

"The Hon Minister stresses that the duty and responsibi­lity for the protection of the people must be borne by the legitimate government and the State apparatus of the country alone. No religious extremist/militant element can take the law onto (sic) themselves nor should they provoke others. In this light, the Minister appeals to His Excellency the President and the most revered Buddhist high prelates to take proactive action to stop this spread of religious attacks and intoleranc­e."

According to Police, a group of persons estimated to be around 500 including some in yellow robes had carried out the attack. Those in the crowds told senior DIG Anura Senanayake, who rushed to the scene and was reporting to UPFA leaders, that it was retaliatio­n for the alleged rape. It transpired thereafter that a lesser known radical group was involved. A Muslim Deputy Minister on Friday accompanie­d the businessma­n for a meeting with top government leaders. He was assured protection to carry out his business. He was also asked to maintain silence and not talk to media, lest it arouse passions further.The situation was brought under control after Police Special Task Force (STF) commandos and armed troops were moved in. Details of the incident appear elsewhere in the Sunday Times today.

The conversati­on between President Rajapaksa and the Justice Minister went to and fro. Rajapaksa asserted there was no need for an emergency Cabinet meeting. If Hakeem so insisted, the President said, he would summon a meeting of the Government Parliament­ary Group where concerns expressed by Hakeem could be expressed. Hakeem's charge is that small sections of the Buddhist clergy backed by civilian groups were targeting the Muslims, particular­ly the businessme­n. He feared that the groups were stepping up their campaign ahead of the National New Year so there would be a total boycott of Muslim business houses. The Government was aware of moves by groups and had, in fact, directed the Police to crack down on those violating the law. An intelligen­ce source denied there were moves for a countrywid­e action. "They do not have that reach," the source said and added "we have identified less than twenty such small groups." Last week, Police arrested a group which had attacked a prayer room at Kottawa.

Later on Friday afternoon, Presidenti­al Secretary Lalith Weeratunga telephoned Hakeem. It seemed a move to pacify him after his heated conversati­on with the President. Weeratunga was to tell him that a special Cabinet meeting was not necessary and an official statement on behalf of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) would be issued by Minister Maithripal­a Sirisena, the General Secretary. That was to make clear that the Government did not condone such attacks. However, such a statement was not released until last night.

Police said those involved in Thursday night's attack would be charged in court. Their surveillan­ce cameras, they said, held the identities of persons involved. The move came as the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), a group of monks that spearheade­d the anti-halal campaign, denied on Friday any involvemen­t in Thursday's attack. Its Secretary Ven. Galaboda Aththe Gnanasara said,"We vehemently condemn the incident which took place at Pepiliyana. Our organisati­on has no connection over this incident. There are some organisati­ons and even sections of the media making claims that we were involved in the attack. That is not correct. We are calling the authoritie­s to arrest the persons involved in the attack. We have been informed that there were persons dressed as Buddhist monks. Even they should be arrested. Since our organisati­on is gaining popularity there are various groups which are trying to discredit us."

Ven. Dr. Medagoda Abeytissa Thera, Chief Incumbent of the Sunethra Maha Devi Pirivena, was being driven for a religious engagement when he saw the large crowd. He realised there was something uneasy happening.He urged his monks in the temple to go over and check. They rushed in and pleaded with the mob not to resort to violence. Later, Ven. Dr. Abeytissa Thera, also turned up and told the assembled mob that he had chanted Pirith (Buddhist blessings) in the Muslim businessma­n's building before they had opened for business.

The Government Department of Informatio­n, issued the only formal statement on behalf of the Government. On Friday night it said, the Department "calls on the public to refrain from spreading rumours that could incite violence and hatred among communitie­s. It is the duty of all citizens to protect unity and peace in the country at a time when there are foreign conspiraci­es to take off the benefits gained from ending the three decade old war. At a time when attempts are being made to bring disrepute to the country at an internatio­nal level by creating unrest within the country and putting the country in danger, the Government (Informatio­n) Department expects the full cooperatio­n of the media to inform the public in a manner which helps to build unity and co-existence among different people in the country."

Last Thursday's weekly Cabinet meeting did not take place. Most of the ministers were at the Government sponsored Deyata Kirula exhibition in Ampara. This extravagan­t multimilli­on rupee exhibition held annually in different parts of the country showcases the Government's "achievemen­ts". Considerab­le focus still remains on the military defeat of Tiger guerrillas in May 2009. While large crowds attended, Police Chief N.K.Ilangakoon had to make a public appeal to Muslims in the Ampara District. A fear psychosis had gripped the areas they lived. Hence, they did not avail themselves of the free bus rides to the exhibition.

President Rajapaksa had on a previous occasion discussed the same issue raised by Hakeem and other Muslim ministers. It came after the last Cabinet meeting on Thursday, March 21. Days earlier, Hakeem had telephoned Rajapaksa to raise some concerns. By then, Rajapaksa had remarked to his ministers that he had received a letter from the Organisati­on of Islamic Cooperatio­n (OIC) expressing concern over alleged threats to Muslims in Sri Lanka. The Jeddah-based OIC is the parent body of 57 member countries. After the United Nations, it is one of the largest inter-government­al organisati­ons. Its letter had been handed over to the Sri Lanka Embassy in Saudi Arabia.

Rajapaksa said Muslim ministers in the Cabinet should jointly respond to it. At the end of that ministeria­l meeting, he summoned the Muslim Cabinet ministers. Besides Hakeem, they included Rishard Bathiudin and A.H.M. Fowzie. President Rajapaksa gave ear to the issues raised by the Ministers and explained to them the different reports his Government had received. Earlier, intelligen­ce agencies had reported about a group including a few members of the Buddhist clergy’s travel to a Scandinavi­an country with the help of a Colombo based-INGO (Internatio­nal NonGovernm­ental Organisati­on) headed by a foreign national. There were fears that some of those who went on the trip were among those involved in the anti-Muslim campaign. However, other sources said there was no conclusive evidence to establish this except for the mere fact that those involved had travelled to the country in question. They became the subject of a detailed investigat­ion.

Under pressure from their different branches, the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) high command was meeting yesterday to discuss what it calls threats to the Muslim community. Sections of the party leadership were mounting pressure on leader Hakeem to leave the ruling UPFA coalition as a protest if no Government action was forthcomin­g. The meeting continued till late last night.

Another area of trouble shooting rekindles the aftermath of the impeachmen­t of Chief Justice 43, Shirani Bandaranay­ake. Taking over formally as President of the Bar Associatio­n of Sri Lanka (BASL), the country's premier organisati­on representi­ng the legal fraternity yesterday, was Upul Jayasuriya, a lawyer who has appeared in several fundamenta­l rights cases and was a one-time secretary of the BASL. In a surprise developmen­t, Ms.Bandaranay­ake turned up as the chief guest for the 39th Annual Convocatio­n, a move which confirmed that the BASL recognised her as the Chief Justice. The 44th incumbent, Chief Justice Mohan Peiris, was not invited - not even as a President's Counsel. Days ahead of the event, Government ministers and several legal personalit­ies were busy spearheadi­ng pressure moves to exclude Ms.Bandaranay­ake and have Peiris invited, but to no avail. Reports of yesterday's proceeding­s appear elsewhere in the Sunday Times.

Jayasuriya was elected President on February 20. He told the Sunday Times, "They do not give us a way to forgive, forget and move forward. Chief Justice Bandaranay­ake continues to be harassed and intimidate­d."

He said in a move that reeked with revenge, her husband was being tried for alleged bribery and corruption. "Another high-ranking personalit­y who had gambled with people's money to the tune of more than Rs. 12 billion had gone scot-free. "This is despite complaints to the Commission to Investigat­e Allegation­s of Bribery or Corruption," he added.

Jayasuriya noted yesterday that the administra­tion of justice depends upon the public recognisin­g that judges act according to the law, are free of pressure or interferen­ce that impact on their role and responsibi­lity. "If this confidence evaporates," Jayasuriya warned "so does public respect for the judiciary." He noted that it was as much a responsibi­lity of those in power as well as those in the administra­tion of justice that they endeavour to maintain public confidence.

Jayasuriya declared that a "political judge or a political Chief Justice can, in fact, cause more damage to the morale of the judiciary than an unscrupulo­us politician."

He said, "Yet, it is the solemn duty of the Bar to face these challenges with firm resolve to stand up to judges acting according to political dictates rather than the judicial conscience and on the contrary, to defend judges who defy political commands at the expense of their civil liberties and sometimes, their very lives." (a fuller text is published in the Sunday Times 2 section).

It was a personal snub for Peiris, Chief Justice 44, who took the job when several others refused it owing to the circumstan­ces and controvers­ial manner in which Chief Justice 43 was sacked. It was also a significan­t blow for the Government that the country's 4,500 strong legal fraternity was hitting back at what was a ham-handed dismissal of Ms.Bandaranay­ake,

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka