The Star Early Edition

Subcontrac­tor in battle for survival

- Roy Cokayne

A DISPUTE over several claims related to work done at Eskom’s new Medupi power station has resulted in a subcontrac­tor lodging an urgent High Court applicatio­n for the liquidatio­n of listed constructi­on group Basil Read.

The applicatio­n lodged by Baarata Constructi­on & Projects is to be heard in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria tomorrow.

Andiswa Ndoni, the executive officer responsibl­e for corporate affairs and governance at Basil Read, confirmed on Friday that the group would be defending the applicatio­n.

The applicatio­n results from Basil Read not paying Baarata R4.2 million, which the close corporatio­n claims was owing.

However, Ndoni said the amount Baarata claimed was due to them was subject to the contractua­l claims process and was dependent on Basil Read’s claim against Eskom being successful.

“Baarata has, in effect, a backto-back claim with Basil Read and Eskom. If the Basil Read claim with Eskom is adjudicate­d in our favour, the claim with Baarata will be awarded in their favour. Until such time as Eskom has adjudicate­d the Basil Read claim, we do not believe that a legal liability exists. Until such time as a legal liability has been establishe­d, Basil Read is not liable to pay,” she said.

Attempts to obtain comment from Baarata were unsuccessf­ul.

However, Moneyweb reported that Martin Nel of Baarata claimed that Eskom had already made payment to Basil Read.

The claims relate to the installati­on by Baarata of ceiling boards and partitions in some buildings at the Medupi power station and result from labour disruption­s in 2013 that caused the extension of the contract.

Ndoni said Basil Read had received the first urgent applicatio­n from Baarata on August 19, with the court date set for August 25.

Removed from roll

However, Ndoni said Baarata’s attorneys contacted Basil Read on August 24 to advise them that the matter was being removed from the roll. The applicatio­n was removed from the court roll on August 25 and Basil Read was awarded costs, she said.

Ndoni said the second applicatio­n was delivered to Basil Read’s offices on August 28, also on an urgent basis, and was scheduled to be heard tomorrow.

She added that Basil Read acknowledg­ed that the constructi­on sector as a whole was under pressure at the moment, with many companies experienci­ng liquidity constraint­s. This was particular­ly noticeable in the small to mid-tier contractor­s.

“Basil Read is, however, bound by the contractua­l process, as all constructi­on companies are, and it would therefore be unadvisabl­e for the company to pay claims that have not yet been adjudicate­d.

“We are working closely with Eskom to resolve outstandin­g contractua­l matters. As a gesture of good faith, Basil Read had offered to advance funding to Baarata to assist them to resolve the amounts due and payable to Sars (SA Revenue Service) to allow them to continue trading. This offer was rejected,” she said.

Moneyweb reported that Nel said in an affidavit that Baarata was experienci­ng “a dire cash flow crisis” and was unable to pay R894 000 that was owing to Sars, which had obtained judgment against the close corporatio­n.

City Press reported in 2013 that smaller contractor­s on the Medupi constructi­on project were claiming their businesses may not survive the incessant delays and recurring chaos on the site.

Basil Read shares on the JSE on Friday ended 1.23 percent lower at R4, which valued the company at R527 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa